Search Results for "award quashing"

1054 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1054 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Doctor in Assault Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence and Malafide Intent. Allegations of Assault on Advocate During Court Proceedings Found Baseless as Complainant Was Not a Public Servant Under Section 353 IPC.

The applicant, Dr. Sanjay Andhare, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of FIR No.60/2015 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Applications Seeking Police Investigation Against Former Mayor and Town Planner in Compensation Dispute. Court Holds That No Cognizable Offence Is Made Out and That the Magistrate's Direction to Treat the Application as a Complaint Was Proper.

The applicant, Atul Ashok Mundada, purchased two agricultural lands in Jalgaon for development. He claimed that the lands were acquired by the Jalgaon...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes High Court Judgment in Tender Dispute, Reinstates Award to Lowest Bidder. The High Court exceeded its jurisdiction by substituting its interpretation of tender conditions for that of the tendering authority, violating principles of judicial review under administrative law.

The dispute arose from a Tender Call Notice dated 30.12.2019 issued by the Office of the Superintendent, SCB Medical College and Hospital, Cuttack, fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Public Interest Prevails Over Private Rights: : BIADA vs M/s Scope Sales Pvt Ltd (2026 INSC 89)

The case arose when the Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority (BIADA) allotted land to M/s Scope Sales Pvt. Ltd. for commercial use. Subsequentl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Land Acquisition Challenges for Housing Scheme — Upholds Notifications Under Land Acquisition Act and Karnataka Housing Board Act. Petitioners failed to demonstrate any violation of statutory provisions or fundamental rights in acquisition for public purpose.

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by landowners challenging the acquisition of their lands for a housing scheme by the Karnataka H...