Search Results for "arbitral tribunal jurisdiction"

1497 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1497 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award in Partnership Retirement Dispute. The Court Examines Whether the Arbitrator Erred in Rejecting Petitioners' Claims and Imposing Costs Under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Background: The dispute arose out of a partnership firm, M/s. Prospective Traders, constituted in 1977 by three family trusts. In 1985, the petitioner...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitrator's Order on Non-Arbitrability. Disputes Relating to Termination for Convenience and Non-Compete Obligations Held Not Arbitrable Under Section 16 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Capalpha Trade Private Limited, filed a commercial arbitration petition under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Arbitration Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Held That the Arbitral Award Was Not in Conflict with Public Policy and Did Not Suffer from Patent Illegality.

The petitioner, Hi Style India Pvt. Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an Arbitral A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Refers Group of Companies Doctrine to Larger Bench in Arbitration Dispute Over Software Agreement. Questions validity of applying the doctrine to bind non-signatory parent company to arbitration under Sections 8, 11, 35, and 45 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Cox & Kings Ltd., filed a petition under Section 11(6) read with Section 11(12)(a) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, seekin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Dismissal of Execution Application for Arbitral Award on Limitation Grounds. Execution of Arbitral Award is Governed by Article 137 of Limitation Act, 1963, Not Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Services Ltd., had granted a loan of Rs.3,95,000 to respondent No.1 for purchasing a tractor, with respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Clause Validity Dispute Under Lease Agreement. The arbitration clause designating the lessee's Managing Director as sole arbitrator is upheld as valid under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, absent contravention of public policy.

The Supreme Court heard appeals by Indian Oil Corporation Limited against a judgment of the Bombay High Court. The dispute arose from a lease agreemen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Cotton Supply Dispute. Consolidation of Claims from Nine Contracts with Identical Terms Does Not Violate Fundamental Policy of Indian Law Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, BST Textile Mills Pvt. Ltd., entered into nine contracts with the respondent, The Cotton Corporation of India Ltd., for the purchase o...