Search Results for "agriculturist relief"

456 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 456 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Seeking Declaration of Lapse of Land Designation Under Section 69(2) of Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 — Petitioner Failed to Show That Designation Was Made Under Master Plan-2031 or That Land Was Not Acquired Within Five Years.

The petitioner, Sri Narayanaswamy, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengalur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Claim for Deemed Lapse of Land Acquisition Under Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 — Petitioner Failed to Prove Non-Payment of Compensation or Non-Taking of Possession.

The petitioner, claiming to be the owner of land acquired under a notification dated 24.06.1986 issued under Section 6(1) of the Land Acquisition Act,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Deemed Lapse of Land Acquisition Under Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 — Petitioner Failed to Prove Non-Payment of Compensation or Non-Taking of Possession.

The petitioner, claiming to be the owner of land acquired under a notification dated 24.06.1986 issued under Section 6(1) of the Land Acquisition Act,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Fragmentation Act Case — Preferential Right of Contiguous Land Owner Upheld. Sale of Fragmented Land to Non-Contiguous Purchaser Violates Section 7 of Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947.

The appellant, Vilas Shivmurti Munde, filed a second appeal against the dismissal of his suit for declaration and injunction. The suit sought to decla...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Plaint in Specific Performance Suit — No New Cause of Action Introduced. Correction of property description in plaint to match agreement for sale held permissible under Order VI Rule 17 CPC as it does not change the nature of the suit.

The petitioners, original plaintiffs in Special Civil Suit No.1324/2017, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale of immovable p...