Search Results for "Section 7"

445 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 445 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in SAFEMA Forfeiture Case — Notice to Convict Not Mandatory When Property Held by Relatives. The Court held that proceedings against relatives under Section 6 of SAFEMA are independent and do not require prior notice to the convict.

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals against a Madras High Court judgment that had set aside forfeiture orders under the Smugglers and Foreign Exc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Land Owner's Appeal in Consumer Case, Holding No Joint Liability for Developer's Default. Collaboration Agreement and Tripartite Agreement Did Not Impose Obligation on Land Owner to Flat Buyers Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The appeals arose from a common judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) allowing a complaint by flat buyers against a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Money Suit Recovery Case — High Court Order for Refund of Anticipatory Bail Amount Set Aside. Full and Final Settlement Not Proved by Oral Evidence Alone When Banking Transactions Admitted.

The appellant, Anita Rani, filed two money suits against the respondents for recovery of amounts allegedly lent or misappropriated. The first suit sou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Fresh Resolution Process for Corporate Debtor Despite Default by Successful Resolution Applicant. Time Spent in Litigation Excluded to Uphold Maximisation of Asset Value Under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

The appeal arose from the corporate insolvency resolution process of Amtek Auto Limited, initiated under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in SARFAESI Act Case on Jurisdictional Grounds. Civil Suit Barred Under Section 34 as Debt Recovery Tribunal Has Exclusive Authority Over Securitisation Matters, Despite Allegations of Fraud in Assignment Agreement.

The dispute arose from a loan agreement dated 26.07.2011, where the appellant acted as a guarantor for a corporate debtor. After the corporate debtor ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Employer's Appeal in Pay Scale Dispute Under Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948. The Court held that office orders introducing a stagnation scheme did not require gazette notification under Section 79, as the Board had authority under existing regulations to fix pay scales.

The appeal arose from a dispute over pay scales for Junior Engineers (Civil) employed by the Punjab State Electricity Board (PSEB). To address stagnat...