Search Results for "Section 100 Companies Act 2013"

924 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 924 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 5204 OF 2019

The present writ petition was filed by six petitioners, including two public limited companies and four individuals, challenging an order dated 30.05....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Air India Disinvestment and Transfer of Employees. Transfer of undertaking under Section 25FF of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 does not require consent of workmen and continuity of service is protected.

The petitioners, three trade unions representing employees of Air India and its subsidiaries, filed writ petitions challenging the disinvestment of Ai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Ruling on Karnataka EMTA Coal Mines Limited: A Complex Case Involving Coal Block Allocation and Legal Interpretations. A detailed examination of the legal challenges surrounding the joint venture agreements, audit reports, and allegations of criminal conspiracy in the coal mining sector.

The Supreme Court of India addressed the appeals filed by M/s. Karnataka EMTA Coal Mines Limited and its Managing Director, challenging the charges fr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Section 34 Application in MSMED Act Arbitration. Court Holds That Section 34 Application Is Maintainable and Limitation Period Under Section 34(3) Applies.

The appellant, M/s. Ravindranath GE Medicate Associate Private Limited, issued a work order dated 9th January 2008 to the respondent, M/s. Clean Coats...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Company Law Board Order — Transfer of Shares After BIFR Recommendation Void Under Section 536(2) Companies Act, 1956. Winding Up Deemed to Commence from Date of BIFR Recommendation Under Section 441(2) Companies Act, 1956.

The appellants, Maharashtra Antibiotics and Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (MAPL) and Hindustan Antibiotics Ltd., challenged an order of the Company Law Board (...