Search Results for "Recovery Panchanama"

1681 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1681 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Credible Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Govind s/o Maneji Vaidya, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nanded, for the murder of his sister-in-law Yamunabai under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder and Robbery Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction Under Sections 302, 392, 397 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Anant Chandru Wake, was convicted by the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Kolhapur on 30/7/1994 for the murder of Mangesh Sawant, a Fores...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Doubtful Circumstantial Links. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove motive, recovery, and last seen theory beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Gopal Bodhuram Gurjar, was convicted by the first Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik, for the murder of his uncle Sonbabu @ Sonpal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Ashwin Chintaman Shambharkar, was convicted by the Special Judge, Nagpur in Special Case No. 18 of 1997 for offences under Section 7 an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Extra-Judicial Confession and Incomplete Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Ramesh and Mukinda Sabhadinde, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Washim for the murder of their father Ramchandra under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Links. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Nagaraja, was convicted by the District & Sessions Judge, Chikkaballapur, in S.C.No.24 of 2008 for the murder of Muddugangamma under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Upholds Conviction of Accused in Murder Case Based on Direct and Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Affirmed as Prosecution Proved Homicidal Death and Accused's Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

Background: The case arose from an incident on 24 March 2013, where the deceased, Smt. Sarita Deepak Kedare, was found murdered in her residence at Dn...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Criminal Appeals Against Conviction for Murder and Conspiracy — Appeals Arise from Same Sessions Case. Court Reviews Circumstantial Evidence of Motive, Recovery, and Defence of Robbery in Challenge to Conviction Under IPC Sections 302, 120B(1), and 498A.

The appeals arose from Sessions Case No.29 of 2014 before the Additional Sessions Judge-3, Nashik, where two accused were tried for the murder of Priy...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Multiple Accused in Dacoity Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Evidence. Convictions under Section 395 IPC set aside as test identification parade was not conducted and recovery of stolen property was not linked to the accused.

The case involves multiple appeals against a common judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha, convicting several accused for offences under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Appeals Against Conviction for Murder and Destruction of Evidence. Circumstantial Evidence Including Recovery of Weapon and Last Seen Together Forms Basis of Prosecution Case Under Sections 302 and 201 of IPC.

The appeals arose from the judgment and order dated 27 January 2012 in Sessions Case No. 124/2010, by which the Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur,...