Search Results for "Prothonotary order"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Prothonotary order"

466 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 466 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Winding Up Order in Loan Dispute — Company's Defence of Bona Fide Dispute and Secured Creditor Status Accepted. Court holds that a winding up petition is not maintainable when the debt is bona fide disputed and the creditor is a secured creditor with alternative remedies.

18 Feb 2013

The case involves an appeal against an order admitting a winding up petition against M/s. Asian Power Controls Ltd. The respondent, Mrs. Bubbles Goyal...

High Court

Bombay High Court Orders Return of Security in Admiralty Suit for Lack of Sister Ship Relationship. Security furnished for arbitration claim cannot be retained when the vessel arrested is not a sister ship of the vessel for which services were provided.

21 Feb 2014

The plaintiff, Condor Maritime Dienstleistung GmbH & Co. KG, filed an admiralty suit against m.v. Western Light and its owners (defendants) claiming m...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Upholds Arbitral Tribunal's Jurisdiction and Interest Award Under MSMED Act. Court held that remedy under Section 18 of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 is optional, not exclusive, and ad hoc arbitration permissible, with interest under Section 16 MSMED Act upheld.

10 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from a contract for supply of VRLA batteries between Petitioner, a government enterprise, and Respondent, a company registered under...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Probate Petition for Will and Codicil of Dr. Bharati Nanavati Due to Suspicious Circumstances and Failure to Dispel Doubts. Court holds that propounders must prove due execution and testamentary capacity beyond suspicion, and failure to examine attesting witnesses or explain unnatural bequests leads to rejection of probate.

22 Feb 2018

The judgment concerns two testamentary proceedings: a Miscellaneous Petition No. 39 of 2004 in Testamentary Petition No. 233 of 2004 and a Testamentar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Probate Petition for Will and Codicil of Dr. Bharati Nanavati Due to Suspicious Circumstances and Failure to Prove Execution. Court finds that the Will and Codicil were not proved in accordance with Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, and Section 68 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, due to lack of attesting witnesses and suspicious circumstances surrounding the documents.

22 Feb 2018

The judgment concerns two connected matters: a Miscellaneous Petition (No. 39 of 2004) and a Testamentary Suit (No. 4 of 2005), both relating to the e...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Specific Performance of Agreement to Sell Property Based on Consent Terms. Consent decrees passed against defendant heirs who stepped into shoes of original defendants, confirming plaintiff's right to specific performance of suit agreement.

12 Aug 2010

The plaintiff, Virsen Balwantsingh Solanki, instituted Suit No. 1808 of 1981 in the Bombay High Court for specific performance of an agreement dated 2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Probate Caveat Case — Real Brother Has Caveatable Interest as Creditor and Under Family Settlement. Section 284 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 interpreted to include persons with slight interest in estate.

26 Jul 2016

The case involves an appeal against an order of a learned single Judge of the Bombay High Court dismissing a caveat filed by the appellant, Purushotta...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Software Implementation Dispute. Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 invoked due to respondent's failure to appoint arbitrator under agreement dated 30 October 2015.

30 Nov 2018

The applicant, SAP India Private Limited, filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Appointment Application for Lack of Jurisdiction — Venue Designation in Lease Agreement Does Not Confer Seat of Arbitration. Court holds that mere mention of 'venue' in arbitration clause without specifying 'seat' does not vest jurisdiction in courts at the venue, especially when subject matter lies outside its territorial limits.

21 Mar 2023

The applicant, Honey Bee Multitrading Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in mustard oil manufacturing with its plant in Ganganagar, Rajasthan, entered into ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Recovery Suit Against Customs for Wrongful Sale of Goods Held by Court Receiver. Plaintiff entitled to refund of purchase price paid to Court Receiver for goods that could not be delivered due to prior sale by Customs.

28 Sep 2010

The suit was filed by M & H Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. (Plaintiff) against the Court Receiver, High Court, Bombay (Defendant No.1) and the Commissioner of ...

34 35 36 37 38

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)