High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Claimant's Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case — No Substantial Question of Law Arises. The court held that the Reference Court and First Appellate Court had correctly assessed market value based on evidence and that the claimant failed to demonstrate any error warranting interference under Section 54(2) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
23 Nov 2024The appellant, Smt. Gangabayamma, was the absolute owner of land bearing Survey No.47/1A2, measuring 20 guntas, with standing trees, situated at C.Nan...
