Search Results for "Prevention of Corruption Act"

461 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 461 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witnesses and Lack of Proof of Demand. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Smt. Shobha Sonba Raut, was serving as Sub-Divisional Officer and Land Acquisition Officer at Osmanabad. The complainant, Dattatraya Ar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Demand. Allegation of Bribe Demand Fails as Complainant's Testimony Lacks Corroboration and Material Witnesses Not Examined Under Section 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Sayaji Dashrath Kawade, was serving as Sub-Divisional Engineer in the Department of Telecommunications at Aurangabad. The complainant, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Recovery Officer in CBI Corruption Case — Applicant Not a Public Servant Under Prevention of Corruption Act. Employee of Private Recovery Agency Cannot Be Prosecuted Under Section 7 of PC Act as He Is Not a 'Public Servant' Under Section 2(c) of the Act.

The applicant, Prashant Vinayakrao Sable, was employed as a Recovery Officer with M/s. Yash Consultancy Services, a private recovery agency engaged by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Manohar Sahadev Parab, a Talathi, was convicted by the Special Judge, Ichalkaranji, under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Police Head Constable in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Complainant and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The present appeal was filed by original accused No.1, Rafiq Beg Mirza, challenging his conviction by the learned Special Judge, Jalgaon, in Special C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Executive Engineer in Corruption Case Due to Prior Exoneration in Departmental Enquiry. Applicant Exonerated of Same Charge in Departmental Proceeding, Making Criminal Prosecution Unsustainable Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The applicant, Keshav Chandrakant Tayade, was an Executive Engineer in the Irrigation Department. An FIR was registered against him and other official...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Termination Show-Cause Notice Based on Conviction Under Prevention of Corruption Act. Suspension of Sentence Does Not Nullify Conviction for Service Disciplinary Proceedings.

The petitioner, S. Armugam, was a Tax Inspector employed by the Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike (BBMP). He was charge-sheeted in Special C.C. No. 6...