WRIT PETITION NO.4540 OF 2024
20 Jun 2025...
Search Results for "Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act 1888"
431 result(s) found
Found 431 result(s)
High Court
- 58
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows MCGM to Construct Suction Tank in Mangrove Buffer Zone for Water Supply to Gorai Village. The court directed authorities to consider MCGM's application for permission within four weeks, holding that the project for public water supply could be permitted subject to due process under the Environment Protection Act and CRZ notifications.
24 Feb 2023The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a mandamus to permit t...
- 48
High Court
Bombay High Court Pronounced Judgment in Writ Petition Lodging No. 3069 of 2018 Regarding Withdrawal of Electric Bus Contract. Dispute Involved Whether BEST Could Withdraw Contract Work Order Based on Note that Acceptance Was Subject to DHI Incentive Approval.
16 Oct 2018The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by Olectra Greentec Limited (formerly Goldstone Infratech Limited) ...
- 19
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging MHADA's Refusal to Register Proposed Cooperative Housing Society Under Section 22 of MHADA Act, 1976 — Held That a Proposed Society Is Entitled to Seek Registration and the Authority Cannot Refuse on Grounds of Non-Completion of Construction.
26 Mar 2015The petitioners, Bhartiya Vidya Bhavan (Bavla Compound) Co-op. Housing Society (proposed) and its promoters, along with Darshan Developers, filed a wr...
- 104
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for 100% TDR in Road Construction Case — Municipal Circular Cannot Override Statutory Provisions Under MRTP Act and DCR. The court directed grant of 100% Transfer of Development Rights for construction of a D.P. Road, following the Supreme Court's decision in Godrej and Boyce.
22 Apr 2014The petitioner, Natvar Parikh & Co. Pvt. Ltd., a company in the business of construction and development, filed a writ petition seeking direction to t...
- 135
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Demolition of Unauthorized Structure Under Section 351 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888. Affidavit-in-Reply to Notice of Motion Cannot Be Treated as Written Statement.
4 May 2011The appellant, M/s. B. Jayantilal, a partnership firm, filed a suit challenging a notice issued by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay under S...
- 36
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Tenant Seeking Alternate Accommodation After Demolition for Road Widening — No Statutory Right to Alternate Site Under Municipal Law.
22 Aug 2005The appellant, M/s Quality Printing Press, was a tenant running a printing and packaging business in a structure at Sunrise Estate, Kurla West, Mumbai...
- 85
High Court
Bombay High Court Restrains Flour Mill in Slum Area on Nuisance Grounds — Interim Injunction Upheld Pending Suit. The court held that the trial court's finding of prima facie nuisance and balance of convenience in favor of the plaintiffs was not perverse or erroneous.
12 Apr 2005The appeal arose from a suit filed by the original plaintiffs (respondents 3 to 10) who were residents of a slum near V.P. Stadium, Worli, Mumbai. The...
- 75
High Court
Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeal Against Demolition Notice Under Section 351 of MMC Act, 1888 — Terrace Room Protected But Three Sheds Not Entitled to Injunction. The court held that balance of convenience and prima facie case did not favour protecting the three sheds from demolition.
7 Feb 2005The appellant, Abhinandan Commercial Centre Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal against an order of the City Civil Court dated 13th January 2005, which partly ...
- 55
