Search Results for "MRTU & PULP Act, 1971"

523 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 523 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Principal Employer Challenging Gratuity Liability for Contractor's Employees. Principal Employer Held Liable Under Section 7 of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 for Gratuity of Contractor's Workmen When Contractor Fails to Pay.

The petitioner, Cummins (I) Limited, an engineering company, challenged a common order dated 30 May 2003 passed by the Controlling Authority under the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Lab Chemist Challenging Termination by Sugar Factory. Industrial Court's Order Setting Aside Reinstatement Upheld as Domestic Enquiry Was Fair and Proper Under MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Arvind s/o Ramnath Lipane, was employed as a Lab Chemist with the respondent, Mula Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., a sugar factory. Dur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature of Bombay Quashes Industrial Court's Order Granting Backwages in Forgery Case Under MRTU and PULP Act. Forgery Held Not Minor or Technical Misconduct; Employer Entitled to Withdraw Deposited Amount.

The case arose from a complaint under the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 filed by an empl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Industrial Court Order Directing Deposit of Gratuity in Termination Challenge — Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Does Not Require Deposit of Gratuity Received as Condition for Adjudication of Termination Dispute

The petitioner, Sheikh Mehmood, was employed as a Typist with respondent Nos.1 and 2 (M/s Universal Medikit Private Ltd. and its Chairman) from 29 Jul...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Labour Court's Order of Reinstatement with 50% Back Wages under BIR Act. Court Upholds Power of Labour Court to Award Lesser Back Wages Without Section 11A Equivalent and Confirms Findings on Theft Charge as Not Perverse.

The dispute originated from the dismissal of five jamadars by Kohinoor Mills (a unit of National Textile Corporation) on charges of theft and miscondu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Labour Court Order Setting Aside Retrenchment as Unfair Labour Practice. Employer Failed to Prove Genuine Closure, Retrenchment of 23 Workmen Without Complying with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Held Illegal.

The petitioner, M/s. Sanket Food Products Pvt. Ltd., challenged the judgments of the Labour Court and Industrial Court which held that the retrenchmen...