Search Results for "Industrial Court discretion"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Industrial Court discretion"

1597 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1597 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Delivers Common Judgment in Batch of Writ Appeals Against Single Judge Order Dismissing Challenge to Land Acquisition under Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966. The Appeals Concern the Validity of Acquisition Proceedings for an Industrial Area Based on Clearance Granted by State High Level Committee Before the Enactment of the Karnataka Industries (Facilitation) Act, 2002.

10 Apr 2026

The matter arose from a batch of writ appeals filed before the High Court of Karnataka against the common order dated 19.11.2012 of a learned Single J...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Grants Direction Dispensing with Section 101(2) Procedure in Reduction of Share Capital – Interpretation of 'Any Other Case' under Section 101(2) and Discretion of Court. The court held that where reduction does not involve diminution of liability in respect of unpaid share capital or payment to shareholders, Section 101(2) does not automatically apply, and the court has discretion to dispense with creditor objection procedure under Section 101(3) in special circumstances.

10 Feb 2005

The applicant, Rallis India Limited, a public limited company, had merged four loss-making subsidiaries, resulting in an accumulated debit balance of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition Order for Unauthorized Commercial Construction. Court upholds MCGM's action under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 for building without valid permission and in violation of development plan reservations.

21 Sep 2023

The petitioners, Kamla Industrial Park Ltd and Metallica Industries Ltd, challenged the demolition notice and stop-work notice issued by the Municipal...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Appoints Sole Arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in a Commercial Contract Dispute. Appointment Made after Respondent Failed to Prove Valid Appointment of Arbitrator Despite Alleged Forfeiture of Right.

19 Nov 2010

The dispute arose from an agreement dated 8 January 2003 between Voltas Limited (applicant) and Rolta India Limited (respondent) for the supply, erect...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Municipal Council's Petition in Daily Wager Reinstatement Case — Full Backwages Denied. Reinstatement with continuity upheld but backwages set aside as employees failed to prove unemployment under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

30 Jul 2010

The Municipal Council, Rajura, filed three writ petitions challenging the orders of the Labour Court, Chandrapur, and the Industrial Court, Maharashtr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Section 34 Application in MSMED Act Arbitration. Court Holds That Section 34 Application Is Maintainable and Limitation Period Under Section 34(3) Applies.

20 Jul 2016

The appellant, M/s. Ravindranath GE Medicate Associate Private Limited, issued a work order dated 9th January 2008 to the respondent, M/s. Clean Coats...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment Before Judgment in Recovery Suit by Financial Institutions. Non-Compliance With Order 38 Rule 5A CPC Does Not Invalidate Order Absent Prejudice.

30 Nov -0001

The appeal arises from a suit filed by financial institutions (respondents 2 to 12) against J.K. Synthetics Limited (appellant) for recovery of dues. ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Stay of Criminal Proceedings under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881—Held That Section 446 of the Companies Act, 1956 Requires Stay Unless Leave of Company Court is Obtained. Proceedings Against Ex-Managing Director in Personal Capacity May Continue Subject to Leave, But Stay Order Attained Finality; Trial Directed to Be Completed Within Six Months.

25 Jun 2024

The petitioner, M/s Rajesh Exports Limited, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution read with Section 482 Cr.P.C., challe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Constitution of Maharashtra State Board of Wakfs for Violation of Section 14 of Wakf Act, 1995 — Notification Nominating Member of Parliament Quashed. The court held that the State Government must strictly comply with Section 14 of the Wakf Act, 1995, while constituting the Wakf Board, and the nomination of a Member of Parliament as a member was invalid.

18 Jun 2010

The petitioners, ten Dawoodi Bohras, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the constitution of the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Wrongful Arrest of Vessel Case — Duty to Mitigate Under Section 73 Contract Act Does Not Apply to Undertaking Under Rule 941 of Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1980. The court held that the undertaking under Rule 941 is a contractual obligation independent of the duty to mitigate damages, and the plaintiff must pay damages as per the undertaking without reduction for failure to mitigate.

5 Nov 2014

The case involves an appeal by Rainbow Ace Shipping S.A., the owner of the vessel MV Rainbow Ace, against an order of the learned single Judge of the ...

34 35 36 37 38

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)