Search Results for "Civil Procedure Code, 1908"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Civil Procedure Code, 1908"

5021 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5021 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals in Partition Suit, Upholds Trial Court's Decree for Partition and Separate Possession. The court held that the suit for partition was maintainable and that the plaintiffs had established their share in the joint family property.

30 Sep 2015

The case involves a partition suit filed by the appellants (plaintiffs) against the respondents (defendants) seeking partition and separate possession...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Consent Terms Recording Satisfaction of Arbitral Award as Not Maintainable. Execution of Arbitral Award Governed by Arbitration Act, Not Commercial Courts Act; Appeals Confined to Section 37 of Arbitration Act.

14 Dec 2024

The Bombay High Court dismissed three commercial appeals filed by Usha Kakade, Sanjay Kakade, and Kakade Construction Company Pvt. Ltd. against an ord...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals Against Section 9 Orders in Arbitration Disputes — Interim Relief Set Aside Due to Lack of Urgency and Failure to Seek Enforcement of Mortgage. Court holds that when a creditor has a mortgage over property, the appropriate remedy is to enforce the mortgage rather than seek interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, especially when arbitration proceedings are already pending or an award has been passed.

8 Aug 2013

The appeals arose from a judgment and order of a learned Single Judge dated 5 February 2013, which granted interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Interim Application in Redevelopment Dispute – Plaintiff Seeks Eviction of Remaining Occupants under Development Agreement. Court Addresses Whether Non-Cooperating Occupants Can Be Compelled to Vacate Pending Suit Where Majority Have Already Vacated.

16 Oct 2025

This matter arises from an interim application filed by the plaintiff, Ambit Life Style Homes LLP, in a suit for enforcement of a registered developme...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appellant's Second Appeals in Property Dispute. Court upholds concurrent findings that appellant failed to prove title and possession over suit properties, finding no substantial question of law under Section 100 CPC.

29 Apr 2014

The appellant, Basavaraj Basavanneppa Pattan, filed six second appeals under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment an...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeals in Partition Suit, Upholding Concurrent Findings on Joint Family Property and Adverse Possession. The court held that the appellants failed to prove exclusive title and adverse possession over suit properties, and that the properties were joint family assets not subject to ouster.

29 Feb 2024

The case involves two regular second appeals filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, arising from a partition suit. The appellan...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 9 and 11 Petitions in License Termination Dispute with Airports Authority of India. Disputes Over Termination of License to Occupy Airport Premises Held Arbitrable Despite Public Premises Act.

7 May 2026

The Bombay High Court dealt with three connected proceedings: two petitions under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and one app...

High Court

Bombay High Court Clarifies Maintainability of Revision Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 — Interlocutory Procedural Orders Not Revisable. Division Bench Holds That Revision Under Section 34(4) is Limited to Orders Affecting Rights or Liabilities of Parties and Does Not Extend to Purely Procedural Orders Passed Under CPC.

21 Jan 2013

The Bombay High Court was seized of three writ petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging orders passed by the Court of Small Causes ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Compensation Revision Applications for Enhanced Compensation — Interest Under Section 28 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Held Payable on Solatium and Additional Amount.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves multiple Civil Revision Applications filed by land owners whose lands were acquired by the State of Maharashtra for the Swarna Proje...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit, Setting Aside Appellate Decree for Lack of Substantial Question of Law. The court held that the first appellate court's reversal of the trial court's findings was perverse and not based on evidence, violating Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

16 Dec 2016

The case involves a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, filed by the original defendants (appellants) against the ju...

34 35 36 37 38

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)