Search Results for "Article 13(2)"

990 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 990 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru considers batch of income tax appeals under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenging ITAT orders for assessment years 2001-02 to 2004-05. Assessee and Revenue both seek to set aside the ITAT decisions and frame substantial questions of law.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru dealt with a batch of income tax appeals filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appeals a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Kotwals' Writ Petition Against Age Bar; Applies COVID-19 Relaxation GR to Group D Absorption. The Court Found That Government Resolution Dated 17.12.2021 Should Be Interpreted Liberally to Include All Kotwals Affected by Recruitment Delays, Ensuring No Anomalous Exclusion.

The petitioners, eleven Kotwals working on honorarium in Aurangabad district, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Probate to Deceased Wife's Will in Testamentary Suit Filed by Husband. Sons' Allegations of Forgery, Undue Influence, and Mutual Will Irrevocability Fail; Court Holds Due Execution Proved Under Indian Succession Act, 1925.

The plaintiff, husband of the deceased Vilasgauri Manilal Doshi, filed a testamentary suit seeking probate of his wife’s will dated 15 April 1970. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Clarification in Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020 — Circular No.21/2020 Held Ultra Vires. The clarification requiring withdrawal of appeal as a condition for filing declaration under the Act was struck down as arbitrary and violative of Article 14.

The petitioner, Macrotech Developers Limited, a public limited company engaged in real estate, filed a writ petition under Article 226 challenging a c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA for Non-Application of Mind and Non-Supply of Vital Documents. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) of the Constitution Violated by Failure to Furnish Statements of Co-Accused and Retraction Letters.

The petitioner, Deepak Bapu Keluskar, challenged a detention order dated 29th September 2014 passed by the detaining authority under Section 3(1) of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Orders Central Empowered Committee to Identify Mining Leases Operating in Violation of Environmental and Forest Laws in Odisha. Court Finds Prima Facie Case of Illegal Mining and Directs Preparation of List of Defaulting Lessees for Interim Relief Under Article 32.

The writ petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution were filed by Common Cause and Prafulla Samantra, alleging rampant illegal mining in the Keonj...