APPEAL NO. 313 OF 2015
1 Dec 2016These appeals arose from a common judgment and order dated 31st March 2015 passed by a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court in two proceedings: Suit ...
Search Results for "subsequent act"
12877 result(s) found
Found 12877 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application for Appointment of Arbitrator Despite SARFAESI and RDDB Act Objections — Arbitration Agreement in Sanction Letter Held Enforceable and Not Barred by Statutory Remedies. The court held that Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act and Section 18 of the RDDB Act do not bar arbitration proceedings, and the applicant's claim under the Sanction Letter dated 19th August 2019 is arbitrable.
15 Oct 2024The applicant, Tata Capital Limited, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an arb...
- 649
High Court
- 31
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench Issues Rule in Writ Petition Challenging Nagpur Improvement Trust’s Street Widening Scheme Involving Protection of Tenants’ Interests. The Nagpur Improvement Trust Framed a Scheme Under the Nagpur Improvement Trust Act, 1936 for Systematic Development of 8.7 Acres of Land, and the Court Considered the Challenge Without Final Resolution in the Available Text.
15 Sep 2016This writ petition was filed by multiple business entities and individuals against the State of Maharashtra, Nagpur Improvement Trust, and others conc...
- 22
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Tribunal's Restriction on Section 80HHB Deduction and Denial of Deduction for Foreign Tax Paid. The court held that only amounts transferred to Foreign Project Reserve Account during the previous year qualify for deduction under Section 80HHB, and tax paid abroad is not deductible under the Income Tax Act.
20 Dec 2016The case involves an income tax reference by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal to the Bombay High Court under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 19...
- 104
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Ban on Gutka and Pan Masala Containing Tobacco or Nicotine Under Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 — Manufacturers' Challenge Dismissed. The court held that the definition of 'food' under Section 3(1)(j) of the FSS Act includes substances for chewing, and that the ban on food products containing tobacco or nicotine is valid and not ultra vires.
30 Nov -0001The petitioners, manufacturers and sellers of gutka and pan masala containing tobacco or nicotine, challenged the validity of the ban imposed by the C...
- 146
High Court
Bombay High Court Addresses Rampant Illegal Hoardings by Political and Religious Entities Across Maharashtra. Court Interprets Definition of Skysign and Requirement of Written Permission Under Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949.
31 Jan 2017The High Court of Judicature at Bombay was seized with a group of Public Interest Litigations and Writ Petitions raising serious concerns regarding th...
- 34
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Non-Bailable Warrants Against Accused in MCOC Act Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Involvement in Organized Crime Syndicate. Court Finds No Material to Implicate Petitioners in Offences Under Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 and Arms Act.
8 Dec 2010The two criminal writ petitions challenged the non-bailable warrants and orders of the Special Court under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime ...
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Application for Juvenile Status Determination in Death Penalty Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Procedural Delays. Applicant Failed to Prove Juvenility Under Section 9(2) of Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, with Discrepancies in Name and Age Documents and Belated Claim After Conviction Confirmation.
27 Mar 2023The case involved an application under Section 9(2) of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, filed by a convict sentenced ...
- 447
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenants' Revision Against Eviction Decree for Arrears of Rent, Damage, and Unauthorized Construction Under Bombay Rent Act, 1947. Doctrine of Relation Back Not Applicable as Amendment Was Not Allowed to Relate Back to Original Filing Date.
13 Sep 2024The case involves a civil revision application filed by tenants (Anil Joginder Sachdev and Rajeev Joginder Sachdev) against a decree of eviction passe...
- 557
