Search Results for "son's appeal not maintainable"

1378 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1378 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Plaintiffs in Property Declaration Suit Due to Omission of Possession Relief. Suit for Declaration and Injunction Held Not Maintainable Under Section 34 of Specific Relief Act, 1963 as Plaintiff, Not in Possession, Failed to Seek Further Relief of Possession.

The dispute originated from a suit filed in 1987 by Arakeri Abbaiah, the original plaintiff, seeking declaration of ownership and permanent injunction...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Appeal in Ejectment Suit — Dispute Over Tenancy and Part Performance Under Section 53A Transfer of Property Act. Plaintiffs Claimed Tenancy Had Terminated; Defendants Asserted Possession Under Agreement to Sell and Assignment, Invoking Shield of Part Performance.

This appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, arose from the dismissal of a suit for ejectment filed by five sisters against two ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition to Quash Compromise Decree in Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction — Held That Compromise Decree Was Not Validly Passed as It Was Based on a Consent Term That Was Contrary to Law and Without Jurisdiction.

The case involves a dispute over property ownership. The original petitioner, Narhar Rango Kulkarni (since deceased, represented by legal heirs), file...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Municipal Election Dispute — Sets Aside Dismissal of Election Petition for Non-Prosecution. Restoration of Election Petition Granted as Tribunal Failed to Consider Sufficient Cause for Absence Under Section 151 CPC.

The appellant, Mr. K. Krishnaraj Hegde, filed an election petition under Section 21 of the Karnataka Municipal Corporation (Election) Act 1979 before ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Property Injunction Case — Trial Court Erred in Dismissing Injunction Applications Without Considering Prima Facie Case and Balance of Convenience. Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC — Court Held That Plaintiff's Possession and Title Must Be Protected Pending Suit.

The appellant, Smt. Jagadishwari, filed a Miscellaneous First Appeal under Order 43 Rule 1(r) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) against the o...