Search Results for "separate account"

6534 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6534 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Disposes of Group of Appeals Against Compensation Orders for Short Delivery by Railways. Court examines challenges based on territorial jurisdiction, statutory notice under Section 78-B of Railways Act, 1890, and interest rate.

The dispute arose from consignments of refined Soyabin Oil entrusted by State Trading Corporation (STC) to the Central Railway at Mulund, Mumbai, for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Default Sentence in DV Act Maintenance Case — Sentencing Without Prior Notice Violates Natural Justice. Imprisonment for non-payment of interim maintenance under Section 125(3) CrPC read with Section 28 DV Act requires prior notice and opportunity of hearing before sentencing.

The petitioner, Vikram Ramesh Rughani, challenged an order dated 20 January 2024 passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate in C.C. No. 96/DV/2018, sentenc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Commercial Dispute Over Non-Payment and Failure to Issue Taking Over Certificate. Court holds that disputes regarding interim payment certificates and issuance of TOC are arbitrable under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The applicants, BSI-JDN Joint Venture and others, filed four applications under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit, Restores Trial Court's Dismissal. Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Suit Lands Were Joint Family Property Under Hindu Law.

The case involves a partition suit filed by the descendants of Nama and Maruti against the legal heirs of Tukaram, claiming that 24 agricultural lands...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Abatement of Suit for Easement of Necessity. Failure to Bring Legal Representatives of Deceased Plaintiff Within Limitation Leads to Abatement of Entire Suit Under Order 22 Rule 3 CPC.

The petitioners, original plaintiffs 1 to 4 and 6, along with Banubai Hariba Mohite (original plaintiff no.5), filed Regular Civil Suit No.278 of 1981...