Search Results for "seizure and recovery"

1826 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1826 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 302 and 324 read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Satish Bansi Lagad, Bansi Kisan Lagad, Kisan Ganpat Lagad, and Aashabai Bansi Lagad, were convicted by the Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Husband for Murder and Cruelty of Wife — Life Imprisonment Confirmed. Circumstantial Evidence Including Motive, Last Seen, and Recovery of Weapon Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Praful Mahadeo Tagage, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Bhandara, for the murder of his wife Manisha and for subjecting her to crue...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Division Bench Upholds Conviction in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Accused's Appeal Against Conviction Under Section 302 Read with Section 34 IPC Rejected as Chain of Circumstances Establishes Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

Two criminal appeals were filed under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the conviction and sentence recorded by the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Robbery in Engineering Student's Death — Life Imprisonment Confirmed. Appellant convicted under Sections 302, 397, and 201 IPC for murdering a friend during a robbery and causing disappearance of evidence.

The appellant, Shaikh Yasir Abdul Mugni, an engineering student, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik for the murder of Jamankumar M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petition Seeking Compensation for Illegal Handcuffing and Parading in a Bailable Offence. The Court Deliberates on Police Conduct and Fundamental Rights Under Article 21 in Context of Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The petitioner, a law student, faced five criminal complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, arising from dishonoured cheq...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Appeals Against Conviction for Murder and Related Offences Arising from Group Clash Over Demolition of Boundary Wall. Court Frames Issues on Applicability of Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC and Non-Explanation of Injuries to Accused.

The matter arose from two criminal appeals against the judgment of the 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur, dated 3 October 2003, convicting the ap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Uncorroborated Trap Proceedings. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, M.C. Manjunatha, was convicted by the Principal Sessions Judge and Special Judge, Mysore, in Special Case No. 69/2004 for offences puni...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Robbery Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Last seen theory and recovery of stolen articles establish guilt under Sections 302, 392, 452 IPC.

The appellant, Nareshkumar Rajpal Bagdi, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Thane for the murder of Shrimati Shraddha Pardeshi and for ro...