Search Results for "registered occupant"

400 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 400 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Co-operative Housing Society Challenging Resumption of Allotted Land. Concurrent findings of fact regarding non-compliance with conditions of allotment upheld.

The petitioner, Shikalgar Co-operative Housing Society, filed a writ petition in 2000 challenging two orders: one dated 06.03.1999 passed by the Colle...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Amendment of Plaint in Property Dispute — No New Cause of Action Introduced. Amendment seeking to add details of alternate accommodation agreement and electricity disconnection allowed as it clarifies existing claim without changing the nature of the suit.

The petitioner, Ravi Ashish Builders Ltd, challenged an order dated 10th September 2018 passed by the learned trial judge allowing Chamber Summons No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision, Sets Aside Conviction in Fatal Jeep Accident Case Due to Unproven Medical Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. The court held that reversal of acquittal was unjustified when post-mortem report was not proved and only one eyewitness supported the prosecution.

The applicant, Anita Sopan Ravalekar, was initially acquitted by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Bhor, for offences under Sections 279, 304A, 337...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Insurance Company Cannot Be Exonerated Based on Unproven Allegation of Hire and Reward. The Tribunal erred in relying on a police statement not tested in evidence to conclude breach of policy terms.

The appeal arises from a judgment of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Pune, which exonerated the Insurance Company from liability to pay compensati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging MHADA Order in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute. Court upholds MHADA's order directing petitioners to vacate and hand over possession of chawl rooms for redevelopment under Section 95A of the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976.

The petitioners, who are residents of Mohamed Tajbhai Chawl in Mumbai, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challengin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Land Revenue Case — Tahsildar's Auction Notice Without Following Section 63 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1956 Invalid. Appellants' Long-Standing Possession and Licenses for Brick Manufacturing on Government Land Protected.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the appellants, who are brick makers and kavelu makers, against the State of Maharashtra. The appellants ha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Eviction Orders in SRA Rehabilitation Scheme — Petitioner Failed to Prove Eligibility as Original Tenant or Purchaser of Alternate Room. Concurrent Findings of Fact by Deputy Collector and Apex Grievance Redressal Committee Upheld as Not Perverse.

The Petitioner, Prakash Bandu Jadyal, filed two writ petitions challenging orders dated 15.03.2021 passed by Respondent No.2 (Deputy Collector, Mumbai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Eviction Suit — Confirms Decree for Possession Based on Valid Sale Deed and Caretaker Agreement. Agreement for Sale and Subsequent Sale Deed Transfer Title; Occupier as Caretaker Must Vacate After Expiry of Term.

The respondent/plaintiff filed Regular Civil Suit No.819 of 2016 for possession and arrears of rent against the defendant, who had sold the suit prope...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows FCI Appeal in Property Tax Exemption Case — Holds That Occupier of Central Government Property Is Not Liable Under Article 285(1) When Ownership Vests in Union. Bombay High Court Erred in Relying on Section 146 of MMC Act Without Considering Ownership Status.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the Food Corporation of India (FCI) against the judgment of the Bombay High Court dated 05.05.2016 and ...