Search Results for "railways act"

705 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 705 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Division Bench Hears State Appeals Against Single Judge Order Quashing Development Charge Deduction. The Single Judge had declared that applying a blanket 33.33% deduction towards development charges in land acquisition compensation awards was impermissible without justification.

The High Court of Judicature at Madras heard three connected writ appeals filed by the State of Tamil Nadu and its officials against a common order da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim — Deemed Untoward Incident Under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989. Bona Fide Passenger's Fall from Train Due to Jerk Constitutes Untoward Incident, Not Self-Inflicted Injury.

The appeal was filed by the claimants, being the wife, children, and parents of the deceased Ajay Kumar, challenging the judgment and order dated 25th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Withdrawal of Inter-Commissionerate Transfers for Inspectors Under Recruitment Rules 2016. Recruitment Rules Made Under Article 309 of the Constitution Prevail Over Executive Instructions, and ICTs Are Not Permissible as They Violate Separate Cadre Identity Under Rule 5.

The dispute arose from a batch of civil appeals filed by Inspectors of the Central Excise and Land Customs or Goods and Services Tax Administration, w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Convicts' Emergency Parole Petition for Suppression of Facts and Misleading Statements. Petitioners convicted in 1996 Bombay Blast case sought emergency parole under Maharashtra Prisons Rules but suppressed material facts regarding their parole history and overstays.

The petitioners, Asgar Kadar Sheikh and Mohd Yakub Abdul Majid Nagul, were convicts in the 1996 Bombay Blast case, serving sentences for offences unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim — Alighting from Offside Due to Rush Not a Criminal Act. Held that falling from train due to own negligence is not a criminal act under Section 124A proviso (c) of Railways Act, 1989.

The appellant, Rekha Suryvanshi, filed a claim before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, seeking compensation for injuries sustained while alighting...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Two Brothers in IT Act Case — IPC Offences Not Maintainable in Light of Section 67 of IT Act. Non-obstante clause in Section 81 of IT Act overrides IPC for offences involving obscene electronic material, following Sharat Babu Digumarti v. Government (NCT of Delhi).

The petitioners, two brothers, filed a criminal writ petition seeking quashing of FIR No. 86 of 2018 registered at Shahupuri Police Station, Kolhapur,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Railway Claims Tribunal Dismissal for Technical Grounds — Affidavit Language Issue Not Fatal to Claim. Claimant's lack of understanding of English affidavit does not defeat compensation claim under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989 when other evidence exists.

The appellant, Shilabai wd/o Raghunath Hemne, lost her husband in a railway accident on 04.10.2002. She filed a claim for compensation under Section 1...