Search Results for "minor children custody"

766 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 766 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Examines Whether Conviction Under Sections 376 and 354 IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act Is Sustainable on Evidence of Attempted Penetration. Court Considers Requirement of Penetration for Rape and Impact of Delayed FIR and Prior Opportunities to Complain.

The present appeal arose from the conviction of the appellant, Siddharth Dagadu Sonde, by the learned Special Judge, Pune, in Special Child Sessions C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Against Conviction Under POCSO Act and IPC for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault and Kidnapping. Trial Court Had Imposed 20 Years Rigorous Imprisonment for Offences Against a Minor.

The appellant, original accused no.1, was convicted in Special (POCSO) Case No.94/2017 by the Extra Joint District Judge and Additional Sessions Judge...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Intent and Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as the act was not intentional but occurred during a sudden quarrel, reducing offence to culpable homicide not amounting to murder.

The appellant, Mohammad Javed @ Zahid Babbuddin Qureshi, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune for the murder of his wife Nazneen under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Family Court Order Returning Plaint in Suit for Declaration of Non-Marriage and Non-Paternity. Family Court Has Jurisdiction Under Section 7 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 to Entertain Suits Relating to Validity of Marriage and Parentage.

The appellant, Arjun S/o Ranappa Hatgundi, filed a suit before the Family Court, Kalaburagi, seeking a declaration that respondent No.1, Sushilabai @ ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape and Kidnapping Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Benefit of Doubt. Conviction under Sections 363, 366-A, 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Lahu Bhausaheb Sonwane, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Shrirampur, for offences under Sections 363, 366-A, and 376 of ...