Search Results for "discretionary orders"

1990 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1990 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Specific Performance Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's discretion to deny specific performance and award damages instead, finding no grounds for interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Rolta India Ltd., challenged an arbitral award dated 8th December, 2010 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Education Society Challenging Quashing of Teacher's Termination. Termination Based on Alleged Caste Fraud Set Aside as Employee's Caste Certificate Was Valid and No Misrepresentation Proven.

The petitioners, Pratibha Niketan Education Society and Pratibha Niketan High School, Nanded, challenged the judgment and order dated 21/08/2015 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Property Injunction Case — Trial Court Erred in Dismissing Injunction Applications Without Considering Prima Facie Case and Balance of Convenience. Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC — Court Held That Plaintiff's Possession and Title Must Be Protected Pending Suit.

The appellant, Smt. Jagadishwari, filed a Miscellaneous First Appeal under Order 43 Rule 1(r) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) against the o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Rejects Trial Court's Dismissal of Temporary Injunction. Agreement of Sale for Rs.10.75 Crore with Rs.5 Crore Advance — Prima Facie Case and Balance of Convenience in Favor of Plaintiff-Appellant.

The appellant, M/s. Sanjeevini Developers and others, filed a miscellaneous first appeal under Order 43 Rule 1(r) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Partition Suit — Order Rejecting Application for Judgment on Admissions Upheld. Court held that admissions must be clear and unequivocal for judgment under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC, and disputed questions of fact cannot be decided in such application.

The petitioner, who is the first defendant in a suit for partition and separate possession, filed a revision petition under Section 115 CPC challengin...