Search Results for "compulsory purchase order"

391 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 391 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Suit for Possession Based on Title — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court upholds that a co-owner can sue for possession without impleading other co-owners and that adverse possession cannot be claimed against a co-owner.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original defendants against the concurrent decrees of the trial court and first appellate court in a su...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Specific Performance of Agreement to Sell Property Based on Consent Terms. Consent decrees passed against defendant heirs who stepped into shoes of original defendants, confirming plaintiff's right to specific performance of suit agreement.

The plaintiff, Virsen Balwantsingh Solanki, instituted Suit No. 1808 of 1981 in the Bombay High Court for specific performance of an agreement dated 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Decree for Partition and Separate Possession. Court holds that a co-owner in possession of joint family property cannot claim adverse possession against other co-owners unless there is ouster or denial of title.

The case involves a partition suit filed by the respondents (plaintiffs) seeking partition and separate possession of joint family properties. The app...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Preliminary Decree. Court holds that a suit for partition is not barred by limitation when the plaintiff is in joint possession and that a co-owner can alienate only his share, not the entire property.

The case involves a partition suit filed by the appellants (plaintiffs) seeking partition and separate possession of their share in the joint family p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue’s Appeal, Holding Compensation for Partial Termination of Agency is Capital Receipt. Termination of Agency for Territory Outside Hyderabad State Results in Sterilisation of Capital Asset, Not Taxable as Business Income Under Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.

The dispute arose from the income tax assessment of Messrs. Vazir Sultan & Sons, a registered firm, for the assessment year 1951-52. The firm was appo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates Tax Treatment of Compensation for Partial Termination of Selling Agency under Income Tax Act, 1922. The Court considered whether the sum received by the assessee for termination of agency rights outside Hyderabad State constituted a capital receipt or revenue receipt.

Background: The case involved the income tax assessment of the respondent, a registered firm carrying on business as selling agents and distributors o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Apportionment Dispute Among Co-owners. Court holds that the Land Acquisition Court has jurisdiction to decide title and apportion compensation among co-owners under Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case involves a dispute among the children of Shripad Deo regarding the apportionment of compensation awarded by the State of Maharashtra for acqu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 661 OF 2005

The case arose from Special Case No. 10 of 2001 before the III Additional Sessions Judge, Raigad, where eight accused faced trial on charges of kidnap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal by University of Agricultural Sciences in Land Title Dispute — Plaintiff Fails to Prove Title and Possession. Suit for Declaration and Possession Dismissed as Plaintiff's Title Not Established and Earlier Injunction Suit Dismissed for Non-Identity of Property.

The case involves a dispute over land measuring 2 acres 20 guntas in Jakkur Plantation, Bangalore. The plaintiff, Smt. Saroja Gupta, claimed to be the...