Search Results for "Surplus Employees"

353 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 353 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Teacher's Petition for Regular Pay Scale Instead of Honorarium for Promotional Period as Shikshan Sevak. Clause 8 of Government Resolution dated 10th June 2005 held inapplicable to promotions, as it only applies to initial appointments.

The petitioner, Shivaji s/o Sukdev Lawate, an Assistant Teacher at Shriman Chandulal Sheth High School, Khed, Ratnagiri, was promoted to the post of S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Petition Challenging Reinstatement of Teacher in Voluntary Retirement Case. Acceptance of Voluntary Retirement Without Statutory Notice Period Under Section 5(3) of MEPS Act, 1977 Held Illegal.

The petitioner, Shri Guru Buddhiswami Mahavidyalaya (the Management), challenged the judgment and order dated 06/12/2013 of the School Tribunal, Latur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Petition Challenging Reinstatement of Teacher in Voluntary Retirement Dispute. Acceptance of Voluntary Retirement Without Allowing Withdrawal Within Notice Period Under Section 7(2) of MEPS Act, 1977 Held Illegal.

The petitioner, Shri Guru Buddhiswami Mahavidyalaya, through its Secretary and Principal, challenged the judgment and order dated 06/12/2013 of the Sc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Slump Sale Case. Transfer of IMFL Business as Going Concern Not Subject to Capital Gains Tax Under Income Tax Act, 1961.

The case involves an appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Land Acquisition Declaration for Sugar Factory Due to Non-Compliance with Section 5A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Collector Failed to Prepare Independent Report or Submit Recommendations, Relying Instead on Beneficiary's Chart, Rendering Section 6 Declaration Invalid.

The petitioners, Sukumar M. Khot and others, challenged a declaration under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, published on 23 June 2005, wh...