Search Results for "Section 15(1) Income Tax Act"

349 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 349 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Debarment of Retired CCI Officials from Legal Practice. Petition lacks bonafide public interest and is motivated by personal vendetta.

The petitioner, Dr. Savio Pereira, filed a writ petition purportedly as a public interest litigation before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Debarment of Retired CCI Officials from Legal Practice — No Cause of Action or Public Interest Established. Petition fails to demonstrate any legal right or public injury warranting interference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Dr. Savio Pereira, filed a writ petition purportedly as a public interest litigation before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Gram Panchayat Employee Challenging Dismissal for Indecent Behaviour. Termination Order Upheld as Gram Panchayat Had Power to Dismiss Under Section 61(1) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 and Procedure of Natural Justice Was Followed.

The petitioner, Ashok Govindrao Sardar, was appointed as a Water Supply employee of Gram Panchayat Pimpalkhuta on 31 January 1986. On 12 December 2012...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Suit for Damages Against Bank in Negligence and Breach of Contract Claim. Plaintiff Fails to Prove Alleged Fraud and Collusion by Bank Officials in Dishonour of Bills of Exchange and Stoppage of Cash Credit Account.

The Plaintiff, Dileep Nevatia, sole proprietor of M/s. Sundeep Industries, filed a suit against the State Bank of India (successor to State Bank of In...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contractor/Developer's Challenge to Majority Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute. Court upholds award of Rs.7,35,000, Rs.10,80,000, interest, and costs under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, finding no patent illegality or conflict with public policy.

The petitioner, M/s. Raviuday Construction Co., a partnership firm, challenged a majority arbitral award dated 15 May 2012 passed by a three-member ar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Rebate Case Due to Non-Satisfaction of Section 15(1) Conditions. Children’s Deferred Endowment Assurance Policy Premium Not Eligible for Rebate as Insurance Not on Assessee’s Own Life Under Income Tax Act, 1922.

The case arose from an income-tax assessment for the year 1960-61, where the assessee, a minor, claimed rebate under Section 15(1) of the Income-tax A...