Search Results for "Section 100 Companies Act 2013"

921 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 921 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court of India: Judgment on Regulation and Approval of Genetically Modified Crops. Ensuring adherence to environmental safety, legal standards, and public health in the approval process for GM crops in India.

The Supreme Court of India concerning various writ petitions filed in public interest related to the regulation and approval of Genetically Modified (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeals in Insurance Company Tax Case — Upholds ITAT Order on Disallowance of Claims and Deductions. The court held that the assessee's method of accounting for outstanding claims and the deduction under Section 80M were correctly allowed by the Tribunal.

The case involves a batch of appeals filed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai, under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, again...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 Income Tax Act as Time-Barred; Notice Dispatched on 1st April 2021 Beyond Limitation. Reopening Based on Accommodation Entry Information Without Independent Material Held Invalid for AY 2013-14.

The petitioner, a proprietor of a petrol bunk, challenged a reassessment notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2013...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Directs Coastal Zone Authority to Decide on Mangrove Cutting for High-Speed Rail Project. Court Holds That Expert Bodies Must First Determine Larger Public Interest Before Permitting Destruction of Mangroves Under Coastal Regulation Zone Notification, 2011.

The writ petition arose from a decision of the Maharashtra Coastal Zone Management Authority (MCZMA) deferring permission for the National High Speed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 5204 OF 2019

The present writ petition was filed by six petitioners, including two public limited companies and four individuals, challenging an order dated 30.05....