Search Results for "Regularization"

662 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 662 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Heard Appeal Challenging Writ Court's Order of Regularization of NMR Employee. Writ Court's Direction Based on Long Service and Panchayat Resolution Was Disputed by Appellant.

The writ appeal was filed by the Executive Officer, Panapakkam Town Panchayat, challenging the order of the writ court dated 30.10.2023 in W.P.No.1787...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Hears State Appeal Against Regularisation Order in Government Technical Institute. State Challenges Direction for Regularisation from Date of Initial Appointment of Employees Not Sponsored Through Employment Exchange.

The State of Tamil Nadu, through its Education Department and other officials, filed a writ appeal challenging the order of the single judge dated 27....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Disposes of Writ Petition Seeking Mandamus for Regularization of Promotion as Assistant Executive Engineer in Chennai Corporation. Corporation's Undertaking to Consider Case After Vacating Status Quo Leads to Disposal Without Further Adjudication.

The petitioner, J. Theodar Livingston, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Judicature at Mad...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court adjudicates writ petition for regularization of watchman services and continuation of sanction under government orders; the court examines whether the Division Bench guidelines in (2008) 4 MLJ 289 were satisfied and directs report on action taken.

The writ petition was filed by a watchman and the CSI High School, Manamadurai, seeking a writ of mandamus directing the Government of Tamil Nadu, rep...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition of Ad-hoc Employee Seeking Regularisation — Appointment Not Through Proper Selection Process. Petitioner Appointed on Ad-hoc Basis as Showroom Assistant in 1997 Cannot Claim Regularisation as a Matter of Right.

The petitioner, Smt. D. Uma, was appointed on an ad-hoc basis on 10.03.1997 as a Showroom Assistant in the Office of the Regional Design and Technical...