Madras High Court Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Stop of GPF Recovery for Employees Regularized After CPS. Petitioners Seek Pension Benefits Based on GPF Subscriptions Despite Regularization After Contributory Pension Scheme Implementation.

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Principal
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

W.P.Nos.11408 and 11412 of 2025 AND

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (MAD) (07) 110

W.P. Nos. 11408 and 11412 of 2025 and W.M.P. Nos. 12875, 12876, 12880 and 12882 of 2025

2026-07-13

S.M. Subramaniam, N. Senthilkumar

2026:MHC:2851

L. Chandrakumar, A. Swaminathan, Dr. R. Gouri, P. Manorajan, J. Chandran Sundar Sashikumar

T.A. Venkateswaran (WP No. 11408/2025) and D. Kumar (WP No. 11412/2025)

1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary, Home (Courts-II) Department; 2. The Principal Accountant General (A & E); 3. The Registrar General, High Court Madras; 4. The Principal District Judge, Vellore

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions challenging the stop of recovery of GPF subscription and seeking grant of pension and pensionary benefits.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of the impugned proceedings in DIS No.1781/2025/A dated 21.02.2025 of the 4th Respondent and direction to the respondents to grant pension and pensionary benefits arising from GPF subscriptions.

Filing Reason

The 4th Respondent stopped recovery of GPF subscription because the petitioners' services were regularized after the implementation of the New Pension Scheme (Contributory Pension Scheme).

Judgment Excerpts

Writ Petitions have been instituted, challenging the stop of recovery of GPF subscription on account of the fact that services of Writ Petitioners were regularized after implementation of the New Pension Scheme, i.e., Contributory Pension Scheme (CPS) with effect from

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Stop of GPF Recovery for Employees Regularized After CPS. Petitioners Seek Pension Benefits Based on GPF Subscriptions Despite Regularization After Contributory Pension Scheme Implementation.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inadmissible Confession and Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as extra-judicial confession to police officer is barred by Section 25 of Evidence Ac...