HomeJudgement

Scroll Down To Discover

High Court

Madras High Court Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Stop of GPF Recovery for Employees Regularized After CPS. Petitioners Seek Pension Benefits Based on GPF Subscriptions Despite Regularization After Contributory Pension Scheme Implementation.

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Principal

Admin

2026-09-03 12:27:18

Font size:

Issue of Consideration

W.P.Nos.11408 and 11412 of 2025 AND

Case Details

2026 LawText (MAD) (07) 110

W.P. Nos. 11408 and 11412 of 2025 and W.M.P. Nos. 12875, 12876, 12880 and 12882 of 2025

2026-07-13

S.M. Subramaniam, N. Senthilkumar

2026:MHC:2851

L. Chandrakumar, A. Swaminathan, Dr. R. Gouri, P. Manorajan, J. Chandran Sundar Sashikumar

T.A. Venkateswaran (WP No. 11408/2025) and D. Kumar (WP No. 11412/2025)

1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary, Home (Courts-II) Department; 2. The Principal Accountant General (A & E); 3. The Registrar General, High Court Madras; 4. The Principal District Judge, Vellore

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions challenging the stop of recovery of GPF subscription and seeking grant of pension and pensionary benefits.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of the impugned proceedings in DIS No.1781/2025/A dated 21.02.2025 of the 4th Respondent and direction to the respondents to grant pension and pensionary benefits arising from GPF subscriptions.

Filing Reason

The 4th Respondent stopped recovery of GPF subscription because the petitioners' services were regularized after the implementation of the New Pension Scheme (Contributory Pension Scheme).

Judgment Excerpts

Writ Petitions have been instituted, challenging the stop of recovery of GPF subscription on account of the fact that services of Writ Petitioners were regularized after implementation of the New Pension Scheme, i.e., Contributory Pension Scheme (CPS) with effect from

One-Time Download (₹149 ₹99) Get Subscription

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appellant's Appeal in Land Encroachment Case, Upholding Concurrent Findings of Fact. The Court held that the map prepared by revenue authorities is admissible under Section 83 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, and the civil su... 2026-09-11 21:16:23

High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Habeas Corpus Petition in CBI Fraud Case — Default Bail Not Available After Charge-Sheet Filed. Investigation Report Under Section 173 CrPC Filed Within Extended Period, Remand Orders Valid. 2026-09-11 21:16:22

Madras High Court Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Stop of GPF Recovery for Employees Regularized After CPS. Petitioners Seek Pension Benefits Based on GPF Subscriptions Despite Regularization After Contributory Pension Scheme Implementation.

Issue of Consideration

Case Details

Nature of Litigation

Remedy Sought

Filing Reason

Judgment Excerpts

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

Bombay High Court Dismisses MBBS Student's Writ Petition Seeking Fourth Attempt in Anatomy...

High Court of Bombay Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Tenancy Orders Under Bombay Tenancy ...

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in Prevention of Corruption Act Case Due to Absence of Pec...

Supreme Court Modifies High Court Order Appointing Different Arbitrator Under Section 11 o...

Supreme Court Upholds Scrutiny Committee Invalidation of Scheduled Tribe Caste Claim but P...

Supreme Court Allows Homebuyers' Appeal and Waives Time Extension Charges Imposed by Devel...

Supreme Court Dismisses Insurer's and Claimant's Appeals in Motor Accident Death Compensat...