Search Results for "Prosecutrix testimony"

519 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 519 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Rape and Criminal Intimidation in Repeated Sexual Assault Case. Victim's Testimony Found Credible Despite Delay in FIR, Medical Evidence of Pregnancy Corroborates Prosecution Case Under Sections 376 and 506(i) IPC.

The appellant, Mahadev Kondiba Jagtap, was convicted by the 1st Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur in Sessions Case No.306 of 2009 for offences ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Convict in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Consent — Conviction Under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Absence of Consent Beyond Reasonable Doubt

The appellant, Munja s/o Jijabhau Bhange, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Parbhani, for an offence punishable under Section 376 of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Gang Rape Case Due to Material Contradictions and Improbable Prosecution Story. Conviction Under Section 376(g) IPC Set Aside as Medical Evidence Does Not Support Rape and Victim's Testimony is Full of Omissions.

The case pertains to an appeal against conviction under Section 376(g) IPC. The appellants, Parmeshwar and Vitthal, were convicted by the trial court ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Circumstantial Evidence and Incomplete Chain of Circumstances. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Mahesh Vasant Chilwante, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge-3, Osmanabad, in Sessions Case No.21/2015 for offences punishab...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Section 354 IPC Case. Material Contradictions in Prosecutrix's Testimony Led to Benefit of Doubt Being Given to Accused.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of the respondent, Pundlik Bapurao Dhabale, for an offence under Section 354 of the Indian Pen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape of Minor Case Due to Material Contradictions and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 342 and 376(2)(f) IPC set aside as prosecutrix's testimony was inconsistent and medical evidence did not support forcible penetration.

The appellant, Vijay Prahlad Warankar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Khamgaon on 24 July 1998 for offences under Sections 342 (wrong...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Unnatural Offence Under Section 377 IPC. Minor Inconsistencies in Evidence Do Not Warrant Interference in Revision as Testimony of Prosecutrix and Medical Evidence Support Conviction.

The applicant, Gulab s/o Shripat Sable, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Washim, for an offence under Section 377 of the Indian P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 363 and 376 of IPC and Section 6 of POCSO Act set aside as victim's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support prosecution case.

The appellant, Sri Subramani, was convicted by the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Kolar on 02.11.2018 in S.C.No.21/2017 for offences punis...