Search Results for "Plaint averments"

1977 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1977 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Rejects Plaint in Money Recovery Suit - Applicant Application Under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC Succeeds -Plaintiff' Suit Barred by Maharashtra Money Lending Act Due to Unlicensed Lending

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard an interim application filed by the defendant under Order VII Rule 11(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Allows Writ Petition Challenging Trial Court's Order on Preliminary Issue of Jurisdiction Without Hearing Parties. Trial Court's Order Set Aside for Violating Natural Justice Principles Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.

The petitioner, Chandansingh Sadhusingh Chandel, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Bombay ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Application to Vacate Ex Parte Ad Interim Injunction in Trade Mark Infringement Suit. Allegations of Suppression of Material Facts Including Limitation of Registration in Class 25 and Prior User Evidence Are Examined.

The dispute arose from a Commercial Suit for trade mark infringement and passing off filed by Shoban Salim Thakur, sole proprietor of M/s. Family Foot...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell Not Binding as Vendor Not Party. Agreement executed between plaintiff and defendant without vendor's consent held unenforceable under Section 54 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

The appellant (defendant in the suit) challenged the judgment and order dated 16/07/2022 passed by the learned District Judge No. 18, Nagpur in Regula...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Disposes of Appeals Against Interim Injunction in Temple Pooja Rights Dispute. Appeals under Section 104 read with Order XLIII Rule 1(r) CPC challenge trial court's order restraining interference with hereditary archakas' rights at Shree Mahabaleshwara Temple.

The miscellaneous first appeals arose from a common order dated 2020-02-19 passed in Original Suit No. 2 of 2016 by the Principal District and Session...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in Forest Land Dispute — Non-Compliance of Section 114(A) Notice Not Fatal at Threshold Stage. Notice under Section 114(A) of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 is procedural and not a bar to maintainability of suit for declaration and injunction.

The appellants, Sidramayya and Roopa, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment and...