Search Results for "Ownership Flats"

570 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 570 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Third Party Claim in Execution Proceedings — ING Bank N.V. Fails to Prove Ownership of Attached Flat. Claim under Section 47 CPC and Order XXI Rules 58 and 64 rejected as bank did not establish that the flat was not owned by judgment debtor.

The case involves a Chamber Summons taken out by ING Bank N.V., a third party, under Section 47 read with Order XXI Rules 58 and 64 of the Code of Civ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Validity of Lease of Manjeetnagar Garden Space to Private Sports Club. Petition Alleges Illegal Diversion of Recreational Open Space Under Development Control Rules and Building Bye-Laws

The writ petition challenged an agreement dated 30.3.1998 between the Aurangabad Municipal Corporation and the Icon National Sports Club, leasing a 26...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging MHADA Order in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute. Court upholds MHADA's order directing petitioners to vacate and hand over possession of chawl rooms for redevelopment under Section 95A of the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976.

The petitioners, who are residents of Mohamed Tajbhai Chawl in Mumbai, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challengin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Arbitral Tribunal's Jurisdictional Order as Not Maintainable. Remedy Lies Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 After Final Award.

The petitioner, Tirupati Shopping Centre Premises Co-op. Society Limited, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of Indi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Senior Citizen Tribunal Order Against Daughter-in-Law Under Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 — Daughter-in-Law Not a 'Relative' Under Section 2(d) of the Act, Tribunal Lacks Jurisdiction.

The petitioner, Ranjana Rajkumar Makharia, is the daughter-in-law of respondent No.1, Mayadevi Subhkaran Makharia. The respondents are the petitioner'...