Search Results for "National importance project"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "National importance project"

444 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 444 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petition under Section 34 of Arbitration Act and Confirms Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute; Appeal Under Section 37 Arises. Single Judge's Order Upholds Award Holding Breach of Contract by Not Supplying DTC Lists

19 Oct 2013

The appeal under section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was filed by Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB)/Maharashtra State El...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Interim Application by Writers of Original Film Against Remake Film Producers Alleging Copyright Infringement of Literary Works. Writers Claim Exclusive Copyright in Story, Screenplay and Dialogues of 1973 Film 'Zanjeer' and Seek Injunction Against Unauthorized Remake in Hindi and Telugu Under Sections 18 and 19 of Copyright Act, 1957.

2 Sep 2013

The matter arises from a copyright dispute over the iconic Hindi film 'Zanjeer' (1973). Plaintiffs Salim Khan and Javed Akhtar, acclaimed writers, cla...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 37 Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Stock Transaction Dispute — No Perversity or Wednesbury Unreasonableness Found. The Court held that a new argument not raised before the arbitrator or in Section 34 proceedings cannot be raised for the first time in a Section 37 appeal.

15 Apr 2024

The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by SATCO Capital Markets Ltd. against Rahul H Bajaj....

High Court

High Court of Bombay Hears Builders' Challenge to Provident Fund Coverage of Casual Construction Workers. Para 26(2) Amendment to Provident Fund Scheme Removes Waiting Period, Requiring Membership from Date of Joining.

28 Feb 2006

Three writ petitions were filed by builders—Sandeep Dwellers Pvt. Ltd., M/s. R.B. Constructions, and Builders Association of India with its members�...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Excise Duty Exemption Case — NCCD, Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess Not Payable When Basic Excise Duty Exempted. Exemption Notification Under Section 5A of Central Excise Act, 1944 Covers NCCD as Duty of Excise, and Surcharges on Excise Duty Cannot Be Levied Without Substratum.

1 Mar 2019

The appeal arose from a dispute between Bajaj Auto Limited (appellant) and the Union of India (respondent) regarding the liability to pay National Cal...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Part — NCCD Payable Despite Excise Duty Exemption, Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess Not Payable. The Court held that Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess, being surcharges on excise duty, cannot be levied when basic excise duty is exempted, but NCCD, being an independent duty of excise, is payable.

1 Mar 2019

The appeal arose from a dispute between Bajaj Auto Limited (the appellant) and the Union of India regarding the liability to pay National Calamity Con...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by ICAR and NRCC, Upholds State Government as Appropriate Government for Labour Dispute. Jurisdiction of Labour Court under MRTU & PULP Act Confirmed for Termination of Agricultural Labourers Employed by Central Government Undertaking.

23 Nov 2010

The case involves an appeal by the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) and the National Research Centre for Citrus (NRCC) against a judgmen...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification Under Karnataka Forest Act. Petitioners Contended That the Levy on Mineral-Bearing Land Violated Article 246, Entry 54 of Union List, and Forest Conservation Act, 1980.

3 Dec 2015

The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by several minin...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Examines Validity of Notification Imposing Forest Development Tax under Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 — Multiple Mining Companies Challenge the Levy as Ultra Vires the Constitution and Forest Laws.

3 Dec 2015

The matter involved a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka by various mining companies, individuals, and an industry assoc...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Petitions Challenging Constitutional Validity of Forest Development Tax Notification. Petitioners Alleged Notification Ultra Vires Article 246 and Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, Seeking to Quash Demand Notices.

3 Dec 2015

A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka by various mining companies, corporations, and individuals, including National ...

33 34 35 36 37

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)