Search Results for "Municipal Party"

3231 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3231 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Councillor's Disqualification Under Section 16(1D) of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 — No Disqualification Found as Respondent No.3 Was Not a Defaulter.

The petitioner, Edwin Francis Britto, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 8th January 2004 passed by the Additional Municipal Commissione...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Nomination of Councillors Without Consultation with Party Leader. Section 63(2B) of Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965 mandates consultation with leader of party before nomination.

The petitioners, Rajaram Appa Patil and Mangesh Sudhakar Tambe, filed a writ petition challenging the nomination of two councillors to the Municipal C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Trial Court's Order Impleading Third Parties in Civil Suit Challenging Demolition Notices Under MRTP Act. Court Holds That Third Parties Having Direct Interest in Suit Property and Being Affected by Decision Are Necessary Parties Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC.

The dispute arose from a civil suit filed by the petitioners before the 4th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Thane, challenging three notices issue...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Tender Award in Municipal Contract Case for Violation of Tender Conditions and Lack of Transparency. The Court held that the Corporation's decision to award the contract to a technically disqualified bidder was arbitrary and unsustainable.

The case involves a writ petition filed by Kirloskar Brothers Limited (Maharashtra Electro-mech Joint Venture) challenging the tender process conducte...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Premium and Interest Demands for Leasehold Land Conversion in Navi Mumbai. CIDCO's demand for premium and interest under Development Charges Rules and lease terms upheld as valid and not arbitrary.

The petitioners, Shelton Infrastructure Pvt Ltd, Neelkanth Infratech Co., and M/s. Juhi Habitat Pvt. Ltd., were lessees of plots in Navi Mumbai under ...