Search Results for "Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act 1888"

431 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 431 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Appeal Quashing Municipal Notice Under MMC Act Due to Jurisdictional Defect -- Notice Under Section 314 Invalid for Failing to Specify Contravention of Sections 312, 313 or 313A

The appellant challenged a City Civil Court order that validated a notice under Section 314 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 (MMC Act) re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Against Order of Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal in Recovery Proceedings. The Case Involves Settlement and Auction of Property of Bradbury Mills Ltd., a Company in Liquidation, with Multiple Creditors and Guarantors.

The writ petition was filed by Everest Fincap Pvt. Ltd. challenging an order of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) dated 22 August 2008, whic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MCGM's Challenge to MERC Regulation on Compensation for Delayed Electricity Connections. Regulation 4.10 requiring distribution licensees to pay compensation for failure to provide new connections within stipulated period is valid and not ultra vires the Electricity Act, 2003.

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM), through its Brihanmumbai Electric Supply & Transport Undertaking (BES&T), filed a writ petition un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MCGM's Challenge to MERC Regulation on Compensation for Delayed Electricity Connections. Regulation 4.10 requiring compensation for failure to provide new connections within stipulated time is held valid under Section 181 read with Section 57 of the Electricity Act, 2003.

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM), a statutory corporation and local authority, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Consti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petitions Challenging Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Property Dispute. Court holds that appointment of arbitrator by consent of parties is valid and cannot be challenged under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment pertains to two arbitration petitions filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The petitioners in Arbitratio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Declaration and Injunction in Property Dispute — Plaintiffs Fail to Prove Title and Possession. Court holds that mere possession of property documents does not establish ownership and that plaintiffs must prove their title independently.

The plaintiffs, claiming to be owners and in possession of a plot of land in Ghatkopar, Mumbai, filed a suit for declaration of ownership and permanen...