Search Results for "Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Act"

702 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 702 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Show-Cause Notice Against Project-Affected Employee in Land Misrepresentation Case. Policy Interpretation Under Section 2(2)(c)(i) of Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1999 Favours Petitioner as Only Land Left After Acquisition Considered.

The petitioners, Kundlik s/o Kosru Mate and his son Sharad s/o Kundlik Mate, filed a writ petition challenging a show-cause notice dated 15.03.2002 is...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Rehabilitation of Project Affected Persons. Notification under Section 4 and Declaration under Section 6 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 upheld as acquisition was for public purpose of resettlement of displaced persons.

The petitioners, heirs of Ramchandra Desai @ Deshmukh, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the Notificati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition and Declares Land Acquisition Lapsed Under Section 11A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Due to Non-Compliance with Time Limit. Award Excluding Subject Lands and Subsequent Inaction for Over Two Decades Leads to Lapsing of Acquisition Proceedings.

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original landowner Laxman Mahadev Katkar, challenged the land acquisition proceedings initiated by the State of Ma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing University's Rejection of PAP Candidate's Appointment -- Mandates Compliance with Prior Judicial Order and Statutory Provisions Under Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1999

The petitioner, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the rejection of his candidature for the post of Agri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Land Allotment and Compensation for Deficit Area in Rehabilitation Scheme — Petitioners Failed to Establish Entitlement Under Rehabilitation Policy and Orders Were Not Quashed.

The petitioners, Rukmini Dattatraya Tirawade and Vikram Hari Palkar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking CBI Investigation into Lavasa Hill Station Project for Lack of Credible Material. Petitioner's vague allegations against politicians and officials did not establish a prima facie case for criminal investigation under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

The petitioner, Nanasaheb Vasantrao Jadhav, an agriculturist and advocate, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) seeking a direction for registrati...