Search Results for "Maharashtra Development Service"

3147 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3147 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes MHADA Order in Redevelopment Dispute — Upholds Developer's Right to Fair Hearing. Section 95A of MHADA Act, 1976 Requires Compliance with Natural Justice Before Revoking Development Rights.

The petitioners, M/s Darshan Jayant Builders (a partnership firm) and its partner Pritesh M. Jain, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Cons...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Tender Cancellation in Public Procurement Case — State's Decision to Cancel Tender Upheld as Not Arbitrary Under Article 14 of the Constitution.

The appeal arose from a High Court order dismissing a writ petition challenging the cancellation of a tender by the State. The appellant, a bidder, co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Civil Revision Application Against Plaint Rejection in MHADA Redevelopment Dispute. Tenants Challenge Jurisdiction of Small Causes Court Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act and MHADA Act.

The case involved multiple civil revision applications filed by tenants of Laxmi Building, Mumbai, before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, chal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Agreement for Sale of Open Amenity Space by Municipal Corporation to Private Developer. Municipal Corporation Cannot Alienate Public Amenity Space Reserved Under Development Plan Without Following Statutory Procedure Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The petitioner, Prashant Bhagwantrao Palande, a resident of Mira Road, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challengin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Re-inclusion of Property in Development Plan After Reservation Lapsed Under Section 127 of MRTP Act. Municipal Corporation cannot re-reserve same property after statutory lapse of reservation.

The petitioner, M/s. Motiwala Land Agencies, owned a piece of land in Aurangabad which was reserved for a public purpose (garden) in the Development P...