Search Results for "Illegal gratification"

458 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 458 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Upholds Dismissal of Bank Manager in Loan Misconduct Case. Disciplinary Action for Violating Service Regulations and Causing Financial Loss to Bank Justifies Removal from Service.

The case involves a Writ Appeal filed by the Tamil Nadu Grama Bank (formerly Pandyan Grama Bank) against an order of a Single Judge of the Madras High...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Public Servant in Corruption Case for Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Appellant convicted under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for demanding and accepting Rs. 500 as illegal gratification for processing a grant application.

The appellant, Manoj Shankar Deshpande, a public servant working as an Assistant in the Fisheries Department, was convicted by the Special Judge, Pune...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Complainant and Lack of Corroboration. Demand of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment of the Special Judge (P.C. Act), Raigad, dated 29.9.2004, acquitting the respondent (accused) o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Vitiated Sanction and Inconsistent Evidence. Sanction under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 found to be without application of mind, and prosecution evidence on demand and acceptance of bribe was mutually inconsistent.

The appellant, Ravindra s/o Marotrao Thakre, was convicted by the Special Court under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for offences under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Junior Engineer Challenging Non-Consideration for Promotion Due to Pending Criminal Proceedings — Directs Consideration of Candidature for Deputy Executive Engineer Post Without Reference to Criminal Case.

The petitioner, Sachin Ganpati Davande, was appointed as a Junior Engineer with the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Upholds Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration — Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra, through the Anti-Corruption Bureau, Buldhana, appealed against the judgment of the Special Judge, Buldhana, acquitting the r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Police Inspector in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Sanction Under Section 19 of PC Act — Conviction Under Section 201 IPC Set Aside as No Independent Offence Established Without Proof of Main Offence

The appellant, M. Manjunath, a Police Inspector, was convicted by the Special Court, Mysore, for the offence under Section 201 of the Indian Penal Cod...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Police Constable in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, a police constable, was convicted by the Special Judge, Kolhapur, for demanding and accepting a bribe of Rs. 5,000 from Bipin Yeshwant ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Rationing Officer in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 7 and Section 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as sole interested witness testimony insufficient.

The appellant, Pandharinath Shelke, was a Rationing Officer at the Rationing Office, Kurla. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Greater Bombay in S...