Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Junior Engineer Challenging Non-Consideration for Promotion Due to Pending Criminal Proceedings — Directs Consideration of Candidature for Deputy Executive Engineer Post Without Reference to Criminal Case.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 79
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Sachin Ganpati Davande, was appointed as a Junior Engineer with the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL) on 6 June 2006. On 2 July 2011, a criminal case was registered against him by the Anti Corruption Bureau based on a consumer complaint alleging demand of money for providing an electric meter. He was suspended and a charge-sheet was served. Subsequently, when the respondents issued a circular inviting applications for promotion to the post of Deputy Executive Engineer (now Additional Executive Engineer), the petitioner applied but his candidature was not considered. The respondents took the stand that since a criminal case was pending against him, his case could not be considered. The petitioner approached the High Court challenging this non-consideration. The Court examined the issue and held that mere pendency of a criminal case does not disqualify an employee from being considered for promotion. The Court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's candidature for the post of Deputy Executive Engineer without reference to the pending criminal case, and if found suitable, to grant him promotion with consequential benefits. The writ petition was allowed.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Promotion - Consideration of Candidature - Pending Criminal Proceedings - The petitioner, a Junior Engineer, was denied consideration for promotion to Deputy Executive Engineer solely because a criminal case was pending against him. The Court held that mere pendency of a criminal case does not disentitle an employee from being considered for promotion, and directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's candidature without reference to the criminal case. (Paras 1-17)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner's candidature for promotion to the post of Deputy Executive Engineer could be ignored by the respondents solely on the ground that a criminal case was pending against him.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Writ Petition allowed. Respondents directed to consider petitioner's candidature for promotion to the post of Deputy Executive Engineer without reference to the pending criminal case, and if found suitable, grant promotion with consequential benefits.

Law Points

  • Promotion cannot be denied solely on basis of pending criminal proceedings
  • consideration of candidature must be based on eligibility and suitability
  • pendency of criminal case does not disqualify an employee from being considered for promotion.
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (11) 212

WRIT PETITION NO. 9204 of 2017

2017-11-13

S.C. Dharmadhikari, Smt. Bharati H. Dangre

2017:BHC-AS:29416-DB

Mr. Meelan Topkar for Petitioner, Ms. Anjali Raghunath Shiledar Baxi for Respondents

Sachin Ganpati Davande

The Chairman & Managing Director, MSEDCL & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ Petition challenging non-consideration for promotion due to pending criminal case.

Remedy Sought

Direction to consider petitioner's candidature for promotion to Deputy Executive Engineer.

Filing Reason

Petitioner's candidature for promotion was ignored because a criminal case was pending against him.

Issues

Whether the petitioner's candidature for promotion could be ignored solely on ground of pending criminal proceedings.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that mere pendency of criminal case cannot be a ground to deny consideration for promotion. Respondents argued that as per policy, promotion cannot be granted during pendency of criminal proceedings.

Ratio Decidendi

Mere pendency of a criminal case does not disqualify an employee from being considered for promotion; consideration must be based on eligibility and suitability.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner, working as Junior Engineer with Respondent No.1-the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Limited has approached this Court, being aggrieved by non consideration of his candidature for the post of Deputy Executive Engineer.

Procedural History

Petitioner filed Writ Petition in High Court after his candidature for promotion was not considered due to pending criminal case.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Under Sabka Vishwas Scheme, Directs Substitution of Estimated Amount with Tax Dues as Per Adjudicated Order. The court held that for the purpose of the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, th...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision in Minor Trafficking Case, Upholds Conviction Under Section 373 IPC. Court Rules Ossification Test by Medico-Legal Expert Reliable and Absence of Female Police Officer Not Fatal as Proviso to Section 46 CrPC Not i...