Search Results for "Dominant Purpose"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Dominant Purpose"

546 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 546 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction Against 'ULTRA TUFF' Cement for Infringing 'ULTRATECH CEMENT' Trademark and Passing Off. The court held that the mark 'ULTRA TUFF' is deceptively similar to the registered trademark 'ULTRATECH CEMENT The Engineer's Choice' under Section 29 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, and restrained the defendants from using the mark.

28 Jun 2011

The plaintiff, Ultra Tech Cement Limited, filed a suit alleging that the defendants, Alaknanda Cement Pvt. Ltd. and another, were infringing its regis...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Injunction Against Trademark Threat in 'HOKEY POKEY' Dispute. Prior Registration of Defendant's Mark Under Class 30 Prevents Passing Off Claim Despite Plaintiff's Subsequent Use.

1 Jul 2011

The plaintiff, Drums Food International Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit seeking a declaration that a cease and desist notice issued by the defendants, Euro Ic...

High Court

Bombay High Court Declares Plaintiff Owner of Copyright in Drawings Developed Under Contract for Valuable Consideration. Payment of Rs.2,87,500/- for Development of Drug Powder Inhaler Transfers Copyright Ownership Under Section 17 of Copyright Act, 1957.

24 Feb 2005

The plaintiff, Macleods Pharmaceuticals Limited, a pharmaceutical company, sought to develop a Drug Powder Inhaler (DPI) device for asthma medications...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against BMC Demolition Notice for Unauthorized Construction. Notice under Section 351 of BMC Act, 1888 Held Valid as Plaintiff Failed to Prove Title or Authorization.

16 Sep 2005

The appellant, Namdev Pandurang Panchal, filed a suit seeking a declaration that a notice dated 19.10.2001 under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Defendant's Appeal in License vs. Tenancy Dispute — Written License Agreement Governs Relationship. Court Holds That Defendant Failed to Prove Oral Tenancy, and Civil Court Has Jurisdiction.

17 Mar 2006

The case involves a dispute between the plaintiff, Mrs. Rosario Boventura Fernandes, and the defendant, Shri Indrakant Shankar Mambro, over a parcel o...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses PIL Challenging Sale of Housing Board Site, Upholds Validity of Sale Deed and Rejects Review Petition. The court held that the petitioner lacked locus standi and the sale was validly executed by the Karnataka Housing Board in favor of the trust.

30 Sep 2021

The petitioner, Mr. Adinarayanasetty, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, styled as a public interest litig...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows PIL Seeking Removal of Petrol Pumps Near Bibi Ka Maqbara Heritage Site. Court directs relocation of petrol pumps within 500 meters of the protected monument under the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958 and Heritage Regulations.

24 Oct 2018

The petitioner, Mr. Shahid Aslam, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) seeking the removal of petrol pum...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Public Servants for Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC. Acts Alleged Were in Discharge of Official Duty, Making Sanction Mandatory; Proceedings Quashed Under Section 482 CrPC.

5 Mar 2015

The judgment involves multiple criminal petitions filed by various individuals, including Mallu S/o Vittal Toravi and others, seeking quashing of crim...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Accused in Multiple FIRs for Unlawful Assembly and Rioting — Lack of Specific Overt Acts and Improper Application of Section 149 IPC. The court held that Section 149 IPC requires a specific overt act or clear nexus to the common object of the unlawful assembly, and mere membership without any particular act attributed is insufficient to sustain charges.

5 Mar 2015

The petitioner, Mallu S/o Vittal Toravi, along with several other accused persons, filed multiple criminal petitions under Section 482 of the Code of ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Hears First Appeal No. 1156 of 2015 Concerning Charitable Trusts and Municipal Corporation. Appeal impugns judgment of lower authority under Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950 and related statutes.

9 May 2025

...

33 34 35 36 37

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)