Search Results for "window period"

588 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 588 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Appeal for Annulment of Marriage on Ground of Fraud and Coercion Under Section 12(1)(c) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Consent Obtained by Threatening to Make Obscene Photographs Viral, Concealment of Material Facts Constitutes Fraud.

The appellant-wife, Monika Narendra Sharma, filed an appeal against the judgment and order dated 7th September 2021 passed by the Family Court, Mumbai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Writ Petitions Challenging Labour Court Awards of Reinstatement Without Back Wages. Held that daily wage employees who worked for less than 240 days in a year are not entitled to reinstatement under Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The judgment involves a batch of writ petitions filed by the employer, Dainik Bhaskar Group (D. B. Corp Ltd), challenging the awards of the Labour Cou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Allows Appeal Against Dismissal of Complaint for Non-Prosecution Due to COVID-19 Pandemic. Delay in Filing Process Caused by Court Closures and Advocate's Inability to Present Envelopes Held to Be Sufficient Ground for Restoration.

The petitioner, Deepak Sharma, filed a consumer complaint (Case No. 153/2021) before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Jaipur-First...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Directs Appointment of Disabled Army Veteran as ITAT Member -- Quashes Compulsory Retirement Finding Mala Fide Actions and Departmental Vendetta -- Upholds SCSC Recommendations in Writ Petition Under Article 32

The Supreme Court allowed a writ petition filed by Captain Pramod Kumar Bajaj against the Union of India and another respondent -- The petitioner, a d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Appellants Failed to Prove Title and Possession. Land Acquisition Under KIAD Act Upheld as Appellants Were Not Owners and Compensation Was Already Paid to Recorded Owner.

The appellants, Sri K. Srinivas Murthy and Smt S.V. Padma, filed a writ appeal against the order of a Single Judge dismissing their writ petition chal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Government Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Quashing High Court's Lapse Declaration. Acquisition Proceedings Do Not Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act as Possession Was Taken in 1981, Fulfilling One of the Twin Conditions Required for Deemed Lapse.

The dispute arose from a land acquisition initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, with a notification issued in 1965 and an award declared in ...