Search Results for "total denial defence"

1772 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1772 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Ms. Leena Balkrishna Nair, was convicted by the Sessions Court for Greater Bombay in Sessions Case No.971 of 2000 for the murder of a c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Summons for Judgment in Summary Suit for Recovery of Project Management Fees. Agreement for Development of Property by Family Members Not a Commercial Transaction Entitling Summary Procedure Under Order 37 CPC.

The plaintiff, Satchi Development Company Pvt. Ltd., filed a summary suit under Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, for recovery of ₹3,70...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Summons for Judgment in Summary Suit for Recovery of Project Expenses Due to Triable Issues. Agreement for Project Management and Development between Family Members Raises Questions of Authority, Consideration, and Entitlement to Reimbursement.

The plaintiff, Satchi Development Company Pvt. Ltd., filed a summary suit for recovery of Rs. 3,70,20,410 with future interest against defendant No.1,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Eyewitness Testimony and Weak Motive. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness testimony found contradictory and uncorroborated.

The appellant, Anna Pandurang Avaghade, was convicted by the 5th Additional Sessions Judge, Satara, for the murder of his cousin Dilip Avaghade under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Reverses Acquittal Based on Misappreciation of Statutory Presumption Under Section 139. The Court Held That the Accused Failed to Rebut the Presumption That the Cheque Was Issued for Discharge of a Debt or Liability.

The appellant, Ghanshyamdas Lalchand Chandak, was the original complainant in Summary Criminal Case 241/1999 under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 188...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in SC/ST Act Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Absence of Public Witness. Caste-Based Insult Allegation Fails as Incident Occurred in Private Setting, Not in Public View Under Section 3(1)(xi) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The appellant, Bashir Beg, was convicted by the 2nd Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Amravati, in Special Case 2 of 2005 for offences under Sections 4...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Nagpur Bench Hears Appeal Against Conviction for Murder on Railway Platform and Evaluates Eyewitness and Forensic Evidence. Appeal Challenges Reliability of Test Identification Parade and Eyewitness Testimony in Section 302 IPC Conviction.

This criminal appeal arose from the conviction of the appellant under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code by the Additional Sessions Judge, Akola in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Restores Conviction Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Presumption of Legally Enforceable Debt Under Section 139 N.I. Act Stands Unless Accused Rebuts with Probable Defence.

The appellant, Dilip Virumal Ahuja, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the judgment and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Reverses Acquittal for Cheque Dishonour Based on Presumption Under Section 139. Hand Loan of Rs.35,000/- Proved; Accused Failed to Rebut Presumption of Legally Enforceable Debt.

The appellant, Smt. Sumedha Chaudhari, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, against the respondent-accused, Sh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(n) IPC and Section 506 IPC set aside as victim's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support rape.

The appellant, Mohan Digambar Lokhande, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge-3, Yavatmal in Special (POCSO) Case 9 of 2018 for offences unde...