Search Results for "taxable services"

432 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 432 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Writ Petition Seeking Quashing of Order and Reference under Section 92BA(i) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Petitioner challenges classification of three transactions as Specified Domestic Transactions based on related party and expenditure definitions.

The petitioner, HDFC Bank Ltd., a banking company, filed a writ petition under Article 226 challenging an order and reference passed by the Assistant ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Block Assessment Case — Tribunal's Finding of No Jurisdiction Upheld. Assessment under Section 158BD of Income Tax Act, 1961 Requires Satisfaction Recorded by Assessing Officer and Warrant of Authorization in Name of Assessee.

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax-I against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The respondent, Shri Gopinath M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes 13-Year-Old Show Cause Notice for Inordinate Delay in Adjudication — Failure to Adjudicate Within Reasonable Time Violates Principles of Natural Justice and Statutory Scheme Under Finance Act, 1994

The petitioner, UPL Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of Indi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Case Regarding Exemption Under Section 4(3)(vii) of Income-tax Act, 1922. Receipt Held to be Business Income, Not Exempt as Casual or Non-Recurring Receipt, as it Arose from Services Rendered in the Course of Business.

The assessee firm, Ram Kumar Agarwalla and Brothers, carried on business as share brokers and paper merchants. Together with D, a chartered accountant...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of IGST on Exports Under Protest, Rejects Unjust Enrichment Claim. Payment under protest does not attract doctrine of unjust enrichment under Section 54 of CGST Act, 2017.

The petitioner, Venus Jewel, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, challenging the refusa...