Search Results for "share control"

1533 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1533 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Directs Execution of Share Purchase Agreement in Corporate Dispute Over IT Park Acquisition. Court holds that SPA is necessary to effectuate earlier order and does not prejudice rights of respondents.

The Supreme Court disposed of a miscellaneous application in a civil appeal concerning the acquisition of shares in I.T. Infrastructure Park Pvt. Ltd....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Eviction Decree in RAE Suit — Tenant's Legal Representatives Cannot Challenge Landlord's Title After Attornment. Consent Decree in Partition Suit Binding on Parties; Tenant Cannot Deny Landlord's Title Under Section 116 of Evidence Act, 1872.

The case arises from a civil revision application filed by the defendants (legal representatives of the original tenant) against the judgment and decr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals Against Appointment of Court Receiver in Favor of Appellants in Commercial Suits Involving Secured Creditors. Appointment of receiver without notice and without considering secured creditors' rights under SARFAESI Act is unsustainable.

The judgment arises from two commercial appeals filed by Future Corporate Resources Pvt Ltd and Ojas Tradelease And Mall Management Pvt Ltd against or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Declaration Suit — Concurrent Findings of Ownership Based on Will Upheld. Court holds that concurrent findings of fact cannot be interfered with under Section 100 CPC unless perverse or based on no evidence.

The Regular Second Appeal was filed by the defendant-appellant against the concurrent judgment and decree of the Trial Court and First Appellate Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Probate Suit for Non-Prosecution and Failure to Prove Will Execution. Plaintiff failed to examine attesting witnesses or produce evidence to prove due execution of Will under Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 and Section 68 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

The plaintiff, Romeo Anacleto D'Souza, filed a testamentary petition seeking probate of the Will dated 26th May 1986 of his mother, Mrs Ermina Pinto D...