Search Results for "sentence concurrent"

725 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 725 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Revision Against Conviction Under Section 138 NI Act Despite Deposit of Cheque Amount. Revisional Court Cannot Re-analyse Evidence in Absence of Perversity; Concurrent Findings Upheld.

The applicant-accused was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 by the learned 10th Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Rash Driving Causing Death but Grants Probation to Young Offender. Concurrent findings of guilt under Section 304-A IPC and Motor Vehicles Act not perverse; benefit of Probation of Offenders Act extended considering age and first-time offence.

The petitioner, who was 18 years old at the time of the incident, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Aurangabad, for offences under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Bus Driver in Rash Driving Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Negligence. Conviction under Sections 279 and 304-A IPC set aside as sole eyewitness did not testify that the bus was driven rashly or negligently.

The applicant, Shivaji Damodar Karne, a bus driver employed with BEST, was convicted by the trial court (28th Esplanade Court, Mumbai) in CC No.40/P/9...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Based on Dying Declaration and Circumstantial Evidence. Life Sentence Confirmed for Accused Under Section 302 IPC for Assault with Tabbal.

The appellant, Shatrughan, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of Jagat Ram by assaulting him with a Tabbal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Convict in Robbery Case, Upholds Conviction Under Section 394 IPC and Section 25 Arms Act — Belated Defenses of Juvenility and Insanity Rejected as Unsubstantiated.

The Supreme Court dismissed the criminal appeal of Mohd. Anwar, who was convicted under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and Section 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad Upholds Conviction Under Section 304A IPC for Rash and Negligent Driving Causing Death — Revision Dismissed. The court confirmed concurrent findings of guilt under Section 304A Indian Penal Code, 1860 for causing death by rash and negligent driving.

The applicant, Popat Bhaginath Kasar, was convicted by the trial court for offences including causing death by rash and negligent driving under Sectio...