Search Results for "seizure and recovery"

1826 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1826 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Absence of Public Witness. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Prasada Sudhakar Kulkarni, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for the murder of the victim. The prose...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeal Against Conviction of Accused in Prevention of Corruption Act Case. Appellant, a surveyor, challenged conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of the Act, contending that sanction order was invalid and amount received was legal fees.

The appeal before the High Court of Karnataka arose from the judgment of the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tumkur, in Special Case No.67/...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376(1), 341, 506, 109 IPC and Sections 4, 12, 17 POCSO Act set aside as victim's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support rape.

The appellants, Kisan Damaji Naik and Ramesh Abidas Vasave, were convicted by the Sessions Judge, Nandurbar, in Sessions Case No. 01/2018 for offences...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Section 120-B read with Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove conspiracy and murder beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, original accused nos. 1 to 3, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bombay, for offences under Section 120-B simplicitor, S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in Copyright Groundless Threat Suit. Suit Under Section 60 of Copyright Act, 1957 Not Barred by Prior FIR and Subsequent Suit if Filed Without Due Diligence.

The dispute arose from a commercial conflict over software copyright. The appellant developed a software for tax professionals, launched in 2007. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Direct Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, M.Raja, was convicted by the Additional District and Sessions Judge (FTC), Vellore District, for the murder of Rajesh under Section 302...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in NDPS Case Based on Confessional Statements and Recovery of Charas. Statements under Section 67 of NDPS Act, 1985 held admissible and voluntary, and recovery of contraband from house and auto rickshaw established guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The Supreme Court of India heard two criminal appeals arising from a common judgment of the Gujarat High Court, which had affirmed the conviction of S...