Search Results for "section 33(4)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "section 33(4)"

523 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 523 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging RBI's Directions to Cooperative Bank — RBI's Directions Under Section 35A of Banking Regulation Act, 1949 Upheld as Valid and Not Violative of Natural Justice. The Court Held That Section 35A Does Not Require a Prior Hearing and the Directions Were Issued in Public Interest to Protect Depositors.

6 Oct 2018

The petitioners, The Veershaiva Cooperative Bank Ltd. and its employees' union, filed a writ petition challenging the directions issued by the Reserve...

High Court

KAHC010100302020_1

2 Dec 2021

The petitioners, a group of renewable energy companies, filed multiple writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Management in Industrial Dispute Over Fraudulent Appointments Under Employment Exchange Act. Termination of 38 workmen justified as their names were absent from Employment Exchange sponsored lists and they took contradictory stands on appointment legitimacy, violating statutory recruitment obligations under Employment Exchange (Compulsory Notification of Vacancies) Act, 1959.

7 Sep 2021

The dispute arose from the termination of 38 workmen by the Management of Bhalgora Area of Bharat Coking Coal Limited (BCCL), a Central Government und...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Rejection of Plaint in Partition Suit for Lack of Leave Under Clause XII of Letters Patent. Court holds that leave under Clause XII is not required when part of cause of action arises within jurisdiction and suit is for partition of immovable property situated partly within and partly outside jurisdiction.

11 Oct 2013

The plaintiff, Shyam Balkishan Chandak, filed a suit for partition and separate possession of immovable properties against his mother and siblings. Th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses MIDC Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases — Market Value Determined Based on Sale Deeds and Potential for Development. The court upheld the Reference Court's award of Rs. 1,00,000 per acre for agricultural lands acquired for industrial development, considering potential for non-agricultural use.

30 Nov -0001

The Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) filed multiple first appeals against the judgment of the Reference Court which enhanced comp...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Partly Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Contributory Negligence from 60% to 50% and Enhances Compensation. The court held that both drivers were equally negligent and enhanced conventional damages following Rajesh v. Rajbir Singh.

25 Jul 2014

The appeal was filed by the claimants, legal representatives of deceased D. Narayanadas, against the judgment and award dated 14th February 2011 passe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to ONGC Promotion Regulations and Supercession of Scheduled Caste Employee. The court examines whether the arbitrary change in promotion criteria without amending the Modified Recruitment and Promotion Regulations, 1980, violates the statutory scheme and results in unjust supercession of the SC employee.

22 Sep 2017

The judgment arose from four writ petitions filed by employees of the Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited (ONGC) challenging their supercession in...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Public Purpose — Petitioner Lacks Locus Standi as He Was Not the Owner of the Acquired Land.

8 Dec 2016

The petitioner, Manoj Mohanlal Bilala, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the land acquisition proceedings initiated by th...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Amendment in Suit for Specific Performance to Include Alternative Relief of Refund of Advance Amount. Amendment Sought Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC and Section 22 of Specific Relief Act, 1963 Held Permissible as It Does Not Change Nature of Suit.

9 Aug 2024

The petitioner, M/s. Samrudhi Groups, a registered partnership firm, filed a suit for specific performance of contract (O.S.No.281/2017) against the r...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO.853 OF 2012

1 Jan 1970

...

32 33 34 35 36

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)