Search Results for "precautions"

354 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 354 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Mother-in-Law in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Dying Declarations and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as dying declarations were contradictory and not corroborated by medical evidence or independent witnesses.

The appellant, Meenabai Lobaji Gaikwad, was convicted by the Sessions Court, Pune for the murder of her daughter-in-law, Savitra Vijay Gaikwad, under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Tribunal Order in Service Matter — Seniority and Promotion Dispute Among Tahsildars. Court holds that the Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal's interim order directing status quo regarding seniority and promotion of Tahsildars was justified pending final adjudication.

The case involves two writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging a common order dated 22.10.2019 passed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder and Robbery Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Links. Conviction under Sections 302, 392 r/w 397 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Madhukara @ Madhu @ Mallesha, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court-I, Shimoga in S.C. No. 78/2012 for offences punisha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Directs Consideration of Compensation for Bomb Blast Victim - Writ Petition for Compensation Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India. The court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation for compensation without expressing opinion on merits.

The petitioner, Leesha, a 20-year-old girl, suffered severe injuries in a bomb blast that occurred on 17.04.2013 at 11th Cross, Malleswaram, Bangalore...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Upholds Compensation for Injured Claimants. Tractor Accident Victim Awarded Rs.1,50,000 with 6% Interest for Fracture Injuries Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by Venkatesh and Neelamma, husband and wife, who sustained injuries in a tractor accident on 19.10.2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Upholds Compensation for Injured Claimants. Held that the Tribunal's assessment of compensation was just and proper, and the insurer is liable to pay the awarded amount.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by Venkatesh and Neelamma (claimants) seeking compensation for injuries sustained in a trac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Upholds Compensation for Minor Pillion Rider. Negligence of Qualis Driver Established as Sole Cause of Accident, Insurance Company Liable to Pay Compensation Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident that occurred on 27.3.2009 at about 11:40 am at the junction of Hebbal ring road near Bharath Cancer Hospital, M...