Search Results for "oral evidence exclusion"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "oral evidence exclusion"

777 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 777 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Set-Off Claim in Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process Under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The court held that set-off is permissible during CIRP as it promotes efficiency and equity, and the moratorium under Section 14 does not automatically prohibit such adjustments when claims arise from mutual and connected transactions.

3 Jan 2024

The appeal before the Supreme Court involved a dispute between Bharti Airtel Limited and Bharti Hexacom Limited (Airtel entities) and Aircel Limited a...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Employment Bond Dispute. Compensatory cost clause for premature resignation held not unconscionable under Section 74 of Indian Contract Act, 1872.

17 Mar 2025

The appellants, Mr. Vivek R Nair and Mr. Raveendran Nair, were the plaintiffs in an arbitration suit (AS No.85/2012) before the 6th Additional City Ci...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Defence Estate Officer in Arbitration Delay Case — Section 14 of Limitation Act Applicable to Section 34 Applications. The court held that time spent in pursuing remedy before wrong forum is liable to be excluded under Section 14, and the delay of few days in filing application under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was condonable.

20 Aug 2013

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by the Defence Estate Officer, Mumbai Circle, against the judgment of a Single Judge of the Bombay Hig...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Delay Case — Section 14 of Limitation Act Applicable to Section 34 Applications. Supreme Court Precedent in Consolidated Engineering Enterprises v. Principal Secretary, Irrigation Department Held Binding, District Judge's Order Condoning Delay Restored.

20 Aug 2013

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by the Defence Estate Officer against the judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court....

High Court

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in Suit Challenging 1973 Sale Deeds. Plaint Discloses Cause of Action and Limitation is Mixed Question of Fact and Law Under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC.

13 Jan 2026

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the defendants (applicants) in Regular Civil Suit No.140 of 2022, challenging the order dated ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Council of Architecture's Authority Over AICTE in Architectural Education Matters — Conflict Between Two Regulatory Bodies Resolved in Favor of Special Statute. The Court held that the Architects Act, 1972, being a special statute, prevails over the general AICTE Act, 1987, in matters of approval and regulation of architectural institutions.

8 Nov 2019

The case involves a conflict between two regulatory bodies: the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) and the Council of Architecture (CoA...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Commercial Summary Suit Cases — Triable Issues Raised on Guarantee and Limitation. Court holds that existence of disputed facts regarding limitation and discharge of guarantor requires unconditional leave to defend under Order XXXVII CPC.

22 Sep 2022

The judgment arises from two commercial appeals filed by the defendants against the dismissal of their applications for leave to defend in commercial ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Builders' Challenge to Circulars Restricting Composition Scheme for Works Contracts Under MVAT Act. Circulars Clarifying That Benefit of Composition Scheme Under Section 42(3A) of MVAT Act, 2002 Applies Only to Agreements Registered on or After 1 April 2010 Are Valid and Within Commissioner's Power.

30 Oct 2012

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution by the Builders Association of India and the Maharashtra Chamber ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds That Question of Excisability of Goods Is a Question of Rate of Duty Appealable Only to Supreme Court Under Section 35L(2) of Central Excise Act, 1944, and Amendment Inserting Sub-section (2) Is Clarificatory in Nature.

6 Dec 2019

The case involves a reference to a Full Bench of the Bombay High Court to determine the appealability of a Tribunal order regarding excisability of go...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Petition Challenging Ejectment Order in Rent Dispute. Subletting Without Landlord's Consent Under Section 15 of Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 Justifies Eviction.

10 Aug 2005

The petitioner, Rasiklal Kumbha Gala, was the original respondent in an ejectment application filed by the respondent, Manilal Ravji, before the Addit...

32 33 34 35 36

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)