Search Results for "mandatory obligation"

2394 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2394 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Land Acquisition Award for Violation of Section 5-A Hearing Right — Personal Hearing Not Afforded Despite Objections Filed by Owner. Denial of Personal Hearing Under Section 5-A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Renders Acquisition Proceedings Invalid.

The petitioner, Talsons Real Estate Pvt. Ltd., owned land bearing Survey No.23/2/1 at Kondhwa Budruk, Taluka Haveli, District Pune. The State of Mahar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Criminal Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Abuse of Process — Quality of a Nation's Civilization Measured by Methods Used in Enforcement of Criminal Law.

The petitioner, Chandrashekhar Bhimsen Naik, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Validity of Departmental Inquiry Against Headmaster Under MEPS Rules, 1981. Alleged Procedural Violations Including Defective Inquiry Committee and Denial of Statement of Allegations Examined.

The petitioner, a Headmaster of a private school governed by the MEPS Act and Rules, challenged his termination following a departmental inquiry. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Non-Payment of Compensation Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Acquisition Lapses as Compensation Not Paid Within Five Years Despite Possession Taken.

The petitioners, original owners of land at Roadpali, Taluka Panvel, District Raigad, challenged the acquisition of their land by CIDCO under the Land...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Gratuity Claim in Payment of Gratuity Act Case — Resignation Not Ground for Forfeiture. Forfeiture of gratuity under Section 4(6) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 requires termination for misconduct causing damage; resignation does not justify forfeiture.

The petitioner, H. Jayarama Shetty, joined the respondent Sangli Bank Ltd. on 28 May 1991. On 3 May 1994, a show cause notice was issued regarding irr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Multimodal Transport Dispute — Arbitration Clause in Bill of Lading Held Valid and Binding. The court applied the prima facie test under Section 11(6A) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and appointed a retired judge as arbitrator.

The applicant, Nagreeka Indcon Products Pvt. Ltd., a manufacturer of aluminium foil containers, sought appointment of a Sole Arbitrator under Section ...