Search Results for "hindu undivided family"

482 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 482 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Assessee's Right to Carry Forward Loss as Vocation Income Under Income-tax Act, 1922. Hold that Decision on Loss in Previous Year Not Binding on Subsequent Year's Officer Under Section 24(2).

The assessee, Manmohandas, was appointed as Treasurer of a Bank in respect of certain branches, sub-agencies, and pay offices. During the previous yea...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Telecom Companies' Appeals, Upholding Tax Deduction at Source Under Section 194H on Discounts to Distributors. Relationship Between Telecom Companies and Distributors Held to Be Principal-Agent, Making Discounts Liable as Commission for Tax Deduction Purposes.

Multiple telecom companies, including Bharti Airtel Limited, Vodafone Essar South Limited, and Tata Teleservices Limited, filed appeals under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Telecom Companies' Appeals on Section 194H TDS Liability Against Distributors. Discounts to Channel Partners Held as Commission, Mandating Tax Deduction Under Agency Relationship.

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of appeals by telecom companies challenging Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders confirming their liability ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore Hears Appeals by Telecom Companies Against Income Tax Department on TDS Liability. Multiple Appeals Filed Under Section 260-A of Income Tax Act, 1961 Challenging ITAT Orders for Assessment Years 2005-06 to 2008-09.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore heard a batch of Income Tax Appeals filed by telecom companies under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 196...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Writ Petition; Sets Aside Order of Chief Commissioner of Income Tax Rejecting Condonation of Delay Under Section 119(2)(b) of Income Tax Act. Compensation for Land Acquisition Exempt under RFCTLARR Act Not Considered by Revenue; Matter Remanded for Fresh Decision.

The petitioner, the widow of the deceased assessee, sought condonation of delay in filing the income tax return for the assessment year 2022-23. Her h...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses HUF's Writ Petition Against Rejection of Waiver of Interest Under Section 234B. Court Holds That Allowable Deduction Requires Actual Expenditure, Following New India Mining Corporation (P) Ltd. v. CIT.

The petitioner, a Hindu Undivided Family engaged in mining and export of iron ore, filed its income tax return for Assessment Year 1997-98 on 31.10.19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Relevance of Age Statement in Will Under Evidence Act Sections 32(5)&(6) and Admissibility of Secondary Evidence. Legal Principles on Will Execution and Burden of Proof Clarified; Endorsement on Birth Register Held Inadmissible Without Examination of Its Writer.

The case concerned a Hindu male who executed a will three days before his death, bequeathing all his properties absolutely to his mother. In the will,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Partition Suit, Restores Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. High Court Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Section 100 CPC by Reappreciating Evidence on Legal Necessity and Antecedent Debt.

The present appeal arises from a partition suit filed by the original plaintiff, Rengan Ambalam, seeking a 1/3rd share in joint family properties, par...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals by Purchaser and Co-Parcener in Joint Family Property Partition Suit. Sale of Joint Family Land by Father as Karta to Cooperative Society Found Not for Legal Necessity, Not Binding on Son's Share Under Hindu Law.

The litigation pertained to a suit for partition of joint Hindu family property. The plaintiff, Udhav Rasne, a coparcener, challenged the alienation o...